User talk:I am an intelligent

August 2020
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Starhaven. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. only (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC) User:Jackmcbarn i am extremely sorry for my act. I like Wikipedia articles very much. Some one added speedy tag to good articles .So i added aggressive words in edit summery. i never repeat again. please unblock me (I am an intelligent (talk) 01:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC))


 * I'm not an admin, so I can't unblock you. By the way, none of those were good articles. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

I am happy to unblock this user unless the two admins above give a good reason not to with the next 24 hours or so (eg: checkuser block). "Who added this speedy delete tag is a brain less fellow" is incivil but not a personal attack, as it is not directed at an individual by definition (cf. "Whichever idiot reduced the speed limit on this road to 20mph needs their head examined" as demonstrated by angry people in local newspapers). More to the point, the user apologised. Apology accepted, unblock pending. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If you're comfortable with it, you're welcome to unblock. My only "condition" is that I am an intelligent should agree that when contesting a speedy deletion in the future, they use a justification for the tag's removal in the edit summary rather than the "aggressive words" (as they termed them) or simply calling it a "good article."  only (talk) 13:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Indeed. FWIW, I usually say something like "decline A7 per WP:ATD-R" (a common reason) or occasionally cite my essay. The important thing is although an A7 tag may be wrong, the tagger is probably acting in good faith and beating them up about it is not helpful. I would also like to see I am an intelligent commit do doing this before an unblock. Also, if this turns out to be a case of sockpuppetry, deal's off. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * IMO, the speed limit example is different than this one, as in that case, no specifically identifiable individuals were targeted, but in this case, there were. I would consider those edit summaries personal attacks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , If you think it is no longer preventative, than I would say go for it. I felt that the edit summary in question was a personal attack (the same way that explains) - however, I can see it from the point of view that you've explained here as well. And as you mention - the editor has apologized for it.


 * I believe 's condition is pretty reasonable, and it seems like you're on top of that.


 * I don't see anything that leads me to believe that sockpuppetry is in play here, for what it's worth.


 * As an aside, in the future If you're going to carry out an action in X time unless you get a good reason not to from Y and Z - you may want to make sure Y and Z are notified of the discussion invitation at a minimum, as a matter of courtesy. SQL Query me!  21:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I would like I am an intelligent to post here saying they agree to Only's condition before unblocking. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

, this is a sock of long-term serial sockmaster and harasser/abuser Nsmutte. Please do not unblock. (Note that the user they "attacked" here is also a Nsmutte sock, though they also posted the exact same thing elsewhere directed at non-socks. This is typical GH/BH behaviour from them.) --09:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonadea (talk • contribs)


 * I had a suspicion that was the case, hence why I said "if this turns out to be a case of sockpuppetry, deal's off". Ritchie333 (talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  09:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)