User talk:I dream of horses/2011/April

The Signpost: 21 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luis Monge


A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Luis Monge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable person.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. I dream of horses (talk) 02:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Uhhhhh ... are you serious ... or are you joking? I barely even hit the "return" key, as I started to type/edit the article.  Not even 3 seconds later, I got a message that you propose to delete it?  Is this for real or a joke?  Let me know at my Talk Page.  Thanks.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC))


 * I'm serious, though you can go ahead and take the PROD deletion tag down. I won't nominate for deletion debate. Promise. --I dream of horses (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * How can you possibly be serious? I typed in literally one sentence ... at 22:29 Time ... and you proposed to delete it ... at 22:30 Time?  How can I take that seriously?  Please explain at my Talk Page.  I don't understand what just happened.  How did you conclude --- in 3 seconds --- that he is not notable?  Thanks.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC))


 * I came to that conclusion because you didn't state notability when you created it (you might've, and I might've missed it). I did a proposed deletion tag instead of a speedy deletion tag to give you time before it got deleted, because, you're right, it might not have been enough time. My decision isn't binding, and you can take down the tag. --I dream of horses (talk) 02:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. Sorry for the delayed response.  I appreciate your input.  Thanks.   (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC))

Nomination of Interactions between micronations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interactions between micronations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Interactions between micronations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. gidonb (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

NPP
Hi, could you please take a moment  to  review WP:NPP, and WP:DELETION. Speed is not of the essence when patrolling  pages,  unless of course they  are blatant  attacks or vandalism. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * What page are you referring to? --I dream of horses (T) @ 14:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not one in particular. It's more to do with the general concern for your patrolling which has now been expressed many times on your talk page, and from a review of your patrol log. There is currently a move to vastly improve the function of New Page Patrolling, and you can help. There are three things you can do: 1. Thoroughly read WP:NPP and take note of the tasks patrollers should be doing; 2. Thoroughly read WP:CSD and understand how and when to apply the criteria; 3.Slow down. If you are also doing Recent Changes patrol, you must also check each edit to ensure that you are not reverting back to a vandalised version. Kudpung (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Speed is not of the essence when patrolling pages
This reversion by you could have used more care. Because other assume you are putting care into your reversions, no one is looking them over. The article sat there for five days with most of that problem text, which I just corrected. As others requested above, please take more time in your edits. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, ouch, you're right, I did go too fast. In my defense, though, removing an interwiki link is suspicious. I dream of horses (T) @ 14:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. Looking over your talk page, it seems that others have posted messages along this same line. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 14:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Possiable Confusion on Rothschild articles
I am deleting racist miteral on these articles, adn you are interfereing with my progress, please stop. --96.38.173.3 (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

North Georgia College and State University
Hello. I just found the article you wrote, History of NGCSU. I was thinking aboutmerging it to North Georgia College and State University. What do you think about that? Click on the "my talkpage" in the orange box after my name and tell me. --I dream of horses @ 20:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I originally thought that the history article would grow and expand and become a better more fully developed article. It hasn't yet materialized like I envisioned. I don't have a problem with merging the articles but I'd rather the History article get beefed up so it would do better standing alone. McBrayn (talk) 03:34, 14 April 2011 (UTC)