User talk:I dream of horses/2013/June

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Untitled
Yes, exactly. The content may be inspired but page still talks about me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jssyedmadar (talk • contribs) 04:00, 31 May 2013‎
 * I replied on your talk page. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Emily Davison
It's implicit in her actions, if you need a source, here you go:

http://www.historytoday.com/martin-pugh/emily-wilding-davison-good-terrorist

Noun A person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims.

(instances of Arson and violence)

ter·ror·ism /ˈterəˌrizəm/ Noun The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.37.252 (talk) 14:57 UTC, 2 June 2013‎
 * Please cite the source inline, within the article, so people don't think she's being called a terrorist willy-nilly. In fact, you may find you need to do this with multiple sources. Here's a simple guide on referencing. Here's a more technical guide on inline citations. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC) (corrected link at 21:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC))

About the speedy deletion of my article
Hi, I have left you the reply on my talk page.

It is the first time that I use 'user talke' on wikipedia. I hope it is the correct way to use it.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 子罕 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 4 June 2013‎ UTC

Please comment on Talk:Zachary Taylor
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Zachary Taylor. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

grateful response to answer re experimenting existing article
TRUMPET: "You got to get up, You got to get up, You got to get up this morn-ing!" (Someday I'm Going to Kill the Bugler!)

(Hope you enjoyed the joke!)

Thanks for the info answer at my talk page! I didn't recognize the "use/construction" tags you provided, which means I never came across them in my orientation to WP, so all the better you helped! I checked 'em out, and it was a relief. Appreciate your use of talkback tags. I myself instead simply put a link to my own talk page at the pertinent subject entry site so a responding/helping editor can get my message of gratitude immediately (as here) and then if needed fire at will to add something there on my turf. Thanks again! I wish you well. --Espresso-con-pana (talk) 22:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Always good to be thanked! You're welcome!
 * Don't understand the reference behind the joke, but enjoy it nonetheless. I dream of horses (T) @ 01:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delighted to clarify: Film This Is The Army, Song title Oh! How I Hate to Get Up in the Morning (Irving Berlin), Line from song cited above in parentheses, Reference amusingly prompted by your statement re your erratic sleep schedule, and the irritating Necessity: "You got to get up!" One of the most delightful things about retirement and no military assignment and no deadlines is no alarm clock and no reveille! Have a bright sunny day! I wish you well. --Espresso-con-pana (talk) 16:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh! Of course! I don't qualify to be in the military (for medical reasons), but I think my dad sang that to me at one point. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Semper Fi! Carry on! --Espresso-con-pana (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey.
Hello. We have been talking on IRC a lot, haven't we been? Scientific Alan 2 (Click here to talk)  (What have I done?) (Me) 21:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, we have! :-) --I dream of horses (T) @ 21:40, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Things people make of your username ...
Don't know if you saw it, but this vandal you warned a month ago decided to play with your username. I suppose it's sort of funny now (and they haven't edited again). Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did see that. They left me a little message about their sexual fantasies. I left them a little note about personal attacks.
 * It is, kind of, funny though. ;-) --I dream of horses (T) @ 02:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC) (edited at 02:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC))
 * Would you like it courtesy blanked or something, nonetheless? Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No, thanks. I let "jokes" like that slide off my back. Occupational hazard. --I dream of horses (T) @ 02:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Good for you. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:India Against Corruption
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:India Against Corruption. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Unix daemons
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Unix daemons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi 'I Dream of Horses' Thanks for the kind welcome. I work for the official governmental tourist council of Greenland, Visit Greenland. I'm relatively new editing/adding content on Wikipedia, and of course I want to do a good and responsible job. Our concern is the service we can provide people that wants to get acquainted with the attractions and activities that one can experience in Greenland, and other travel-related information, but without braking any rules or guidelines of the Wikipedia community. Again thanks for the help and concern!

Kind regards MadsLumholt (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It is strongly advised that you don't write on behalf of your employer, as it's incredibly difficult to do so neutrally, and controversial even if you can pull off writing neutrally. You can read about our conflict of interest guidelines here.
 * Also, group accounts are explicitly prohibited. Is this a group account, or is only one person controlling it? I dream of horses (T) @ 18:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Margaret Mutu
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Margaret Mutu. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks also for welcome message.
Thanks IDOH, I'd appreciate any critiques on my NY political pages you can offer. Also I hope you're willing to come to bat because I post "conveniently omitted" controversial issues on NY politicaians and they often delete masses of facts, cites and texts that they deem "uncomfortable truths". CutThruTheNoise (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Make sure you use reliable citations for any controversial pieces of information you have about any topic, but particularly about living people. To do otherwise is to risk committing libel.
 * Dealing with controversial figures is uncomfortable even for me. You should probably start out with something simpler. If you don't, please keep in mind the articles you edit aren't "yours". --I dream of horses (T) @ 17:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for welcome message.
Dear I dream of horses: Thanks for welcome message.

Just if you can help enhancing this page []! Thanks--Esaakany (talk) 02:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like you're trying to recreate an article that's been deleted three times. Perhaps you should start out with something much, much easier, like copyediting. --I dream of horses (T) @ 17:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear I dream of horses:
 * I found that this page was deleted 5 years ago, for lack of references. Now you think it is not OK?
 * Best --Esaakany (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No, at least reference-wise, but I don't think writing articles is simplistic enough to start out with. I dream of horses (T) @ 00:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Gwyneth Scully
I never edited and I never put more of the description on Gwyneth Scully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heyrubengarcia (talk • contribs) 15:52, 24 June 2013‎ UTC
 * Actually, you edit quite a bit. Here's the evidence.
 * I'm not even sure if I ever left a message on your talk page. --I dream of horses (T) @ 01:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Lumbee wiki article violates the 5 pillars and does not strive to be accurate and is not verifiable or neutral and is extremely contraversial
We strive for articles that document and explain the major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone. We avoid advocacy and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or a living person. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong.

The Lumbee keep posting that they were "federally recognized" by the Lumbee Act as an "Indian Tribe" ...this is false The Lumbee Act was far from Federal recognition and was a name Designation only and actually barred the Lumbee from seeking federal recognition under false names like the Cherokee that they had been using because they lacked proof of any historical connection to any Indian tribe,it was all based on legend and the lost colony myth

It would be respectful for them to not stete that they were Federally Recognized by the Lumbee Act as this is completely False..........The Lumbee are trying to get federal recognition because they never were federally recognized just "Designated as Lumbee People" a name gesture a political concession only not recognition.

No where in the Lumbee Act does it infer Federal Recognition,acknowledgement or wardship by the federal government the Act infact actually forbids a government relationship with the Lumbee,that was its intent.a name only...and not as an Indian Tribe either. no where in the act does it refer or recognize them as an "Indian Tribe" Tribe is the key word here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50johns (talk • contribs) 00:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you verify this with independent, reliable sources that significantly mention what's going on?
 * Independent=Nobody associated with the subject made the source.
 * Reliable=Generally trusted to have editorial oversight and fact checking.
 * Significant mention=About a paragraph. I dream of horses (T) @ 07:00, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cary Grant
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cary Grant. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome!
Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia. It's nice to feel welcome here. :D

Badgernation777 (talk) 06:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. --I dream of horses (T) @ 06:51, 30 June 2013 (UTC)