User talk:I dream of horses/2013/September

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Good evening, As you see i am new to Wikipedia, so please kindly co operate and please not lock or block. I am not getting in which catergory i should put Sayyid Ahmedullah Qadri Wiki page, needed some help here. Thanking you

regarding loading pictures
When can i load pictures on Wikipedia page ?

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charotar University of Science and Technology
Thank you for your note regarding my edit to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charotar University of Science and Technology after you tagged it for speedy deletion (CSD G13). I sometimes visit Category:Candidates for speedy deletion to try to rescue articles that other editors have tagged for deletion, and this was an article submission that had been untouched for more than six months. As it happened, there already was an article about Charotar University of Science and Technology in article space, so I abandoned the articles-for-creation submission after I discovered a full article already existed. There are a lot of rejected articles-for-creation submissions that could be turned into adequate articles. Of course, I recognize that many other rejected submissions cannot be salvaged. I would like to encourage more editors to visit Category:Declined AfC submissions to look for rejected submissions that seem to be about a notable topic and fix them. I read your user page. Thank you for all the work you do on Wikipedia, and best wishes. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You seem thoughtful.
 * I'm simply not the best at article-rescuing. I don't have an interest where I have a ton of offline sources for, or that I'd feel comfortable researching solely online. Most G-13 eligible submissions don't have a lot of sources, on top of that. The main reason why I began nominating G-13 eligible submissions is that I don't expect anyone to show up and clean up an eye-crossably bad article, and oddly enough, I don't feel qualified to do it myself, at least to the point of having the article have a 50/50 chance of surviving AfD. So thanks for even attempting. --I dream of horses (T) @ 07:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission SeaKeeper 1000


Hello I dream of horses. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled SeaKeeper 1000.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Khan Yunis massacre
Hello again,

There has been some issues with the Khan Yunis massacre article we discussed a while back. A somewhat biased administrator of Israeli origin has given it a poor rating on WikiProject Israel's scale and claimed it to violate POV (I have since refuted the latter argument, no need to worry about it.)

If you'd be willing, I need a completely neutral, uninvolved individual to reassess the article. While I believe it deserves better than a Start rating, even if it is still deserved, there's no harm in checking, right?

If you'd be of assistance, that'd be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance, 1Matt20 23:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am very cautious about editing articles under sanction.
 * Perhaps you should use some sort of dispute resolution, like third opinion. I dream of horses (T) @ 00:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC) (corrected typo at ˜˜˜˜˜)

Chad Johnson (cornerback)
The only person who needs a PROD notification is the article creator. Your notice on my and other editor's talk pages were not necessary....William 10:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, the article creator needs a PROD notification, but the article creator, if the article was created years ago, is often inactive, rendering the notification pretty close to pointless. It isn't like the creator is likely to respond until months or even years after the fact, you know?
 * I'd rather people be upset over a frivolous notification, than have people upset over a non-notification because they could've done something to fix the article. Really, said ability to rescue an article is pretty hard to assess--even an AWBer or vandal fighter might have the ability to do so.
 * If you don't like the notification, simply remove it. --I dream of horses (T) @ 20:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Josh Willis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Josh Willis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:58, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Put barnstar on awards page
 * Thanks for the barnstar. However, you'll need to realize that I do a lot of "automated" or "assisted" editing, and often forget to use the preview button, both of which drive up your edit count. I dream of horses (T) @ 21:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC) (Pinged  at 21:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC))

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Untitled
I'm not sure what the problem is within Wikipedia, but when I upload my photographs many times someone within the bowels of Wikipedia questions as to whether the photos are mine. When I say 'mine,' I mean, I held the camera, snapped the shutter, and recorded the scene. From that moment forward the images, IAW with US intellectual property laws, are copyrighted to me, the originator. However, for the sake of aiding Wikipedia with images to improve their site, I have contributed my 'copyrighted photos' (that phrase is redundant). Because no one on Wikipedia can write in clear text messages, I'm not sure what the problem is. Is the problem that I have marked them in a particular manner as copyrighted, or is someone questioning that they are mine to contribute? I could use an answer to those questions.

As I'm not well-versed in writing html code my skill sets are limited to taking photos and adding them in appropriate pages for Wikipedia. What I do object to are do-gooders who question my images, and promptly suggest to the powers that be that my images be removed because they are some sort of violation. What am I violating by putting MY images up? Help me out here? Is there a particular magic copyright phrase I'm supposed to select when I contribute images to Wikipedia?

I frankly don't have the time as many of you obviously have to play games on Wikipedia with non-sensical diatribes back and forth regarding a picture or two. The bottom line is that they belong to me--I took them, and I should be able to contribute them without some Gestapo-type interventionist telling the world that my photos are not mine. Upon what are these accusations based? Did I mislabel the copyright somehow? Are they saying I never took the photo(s)? Can someone answer in simple, concise, clear English to me?

Dan Lindsay, aka Edgy01
 * The problem within Wikipedia is that, with limited exceptions regarding fair-use images that can't be replaced, we can't accept fully copyrighted images, and your images are fully copyrighted. It doesn't matter that you hold the copyright. What matters is that it's fully copyrighted. If you want your images to be used on Wikipedia freely, you'll have to release them under a copyright license like CC-BY-SA.
 * Another problem is that I'm not even sure if it's confirmed that you are Dan Lindsay, and not somebody impersonating Dan Lindsay. I dream of horses (T) @ 16:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Dan, very plain language: the reason the image was nominated for deletion (follow the link) is that an editor doubted you were really the photographer and thought you uploaded from another website. I've disagree with that editor, have provided evidence why, and have have said that it is preferable to keep that image. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * IDoH: Where do you see a full copyright claim? File:Colonel Harland Sanders in character.jpg is clearly marked as dual-licensed GNU Free Documentation / CC-BY-SA 3.0. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Crisco, if there's evidence that Dan Lindsay is who he says he is, then it needs to be bought to OTRS. I dream of horses (T) @ 18:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * And you are insisting on this... why? He's not a professional photographer, and these works haven't been shown to be previously published. There is nothing in policy preventing people from scanning their old photographic prints and uploading here, except if it has been previously published. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:55, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I insist on it to be on the safe side. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:29, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Which, again, is not supported by policy; read Donating copyrighted materials, which simply says (to paraphrase) sign up and upload to Commons. Commons likewise doesn't suggest OTRS is required for all editors (see Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?). Admittedly, some people, even if they are Wikipedia editors, do use OTRS simply because they are already notable professional photographers and the photographs have likely already been published (Allan Warren comes to mind). For the general editor, such as you, Dan, or I, a simple declaration of consent such as a free license is enough so long as there is no indication that an image was previously published. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

It appears you are correct. My apologies. I dream of horses (T) @ 02:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for the cookies. I am trying to improve the quality of my town's wiki page but I find wiki over-complicated and the in-house language is isolating. However, I will persevere and with friendly help from people like you I am sure to succeed ;-)

Perhaps you could help with one thing;

1) I would like to place the town's official logo on the site (I believe there is a specific location for it under "logo")but try as I might it never works...

Thanks again for the warm welcome.

Authentic Alberta (talk) 04:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I kind of know what to do, but I'll admit to never having uploaded a picture.
 * The answer to your question would depend on the copyright status of the logo--some governments (like the US government) make a habit of immediately releasing images into the public domain, and copyrights also expire. We accept copyright licenses other than public domain, but I'd be surprised if a town logo were to be licensed under said licenses. So I'll just assume it's either fully copyrighted, or in the public domain, but I might be wrong, too.
 * If it's public domain, you can upload it directly to Wikimedia Commons, which is a "sister project" to Wikipedia. That way, any language Wikipedia can use it, not just the English Wikipedia.
 * If it's fully copyrighted, you'll have to wait four days, and have ten edits to upload the logo under a fair use exemption using the file upload wizard. I dream of horses (T) @ 04:28, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I have uploaded images before to wiki commons (I am responsible for all bar 1 image on the page). I did previous edits under "filedstones" but forgot my password and could never retrieve it. I therefore just created a new profile. The image is copyright but I have the express permission of the Town to add it to the page.


 * Best,


 * Authentic Alberta (talk) 04:38, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, having express permission isn't enough. Somebody that has the right to release copyright has to relicense the logo under something like this Creative Commons license, or the GNU free documentation license, both which allows people to distribute and modify the logo for both commercial and non-noncommercial purposes as long as the person doing it attributes it properly.
 * Otherwise, we'll need to use the logo under fair use. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC) (clarification, wiklink fix at 19:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC))

Untitled
Thank you for your assistance. I will see what I can do for permission.

198.53.240.69 (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Many thanks for the welcome and the cookies.J-boogie7 (talk) 23:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! --I dream of horses (T) @ 23:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Penis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Penis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 Wikification Drive
This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)