User talk:I have a dig bick

January 2018
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Guangzhou— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sainsbury's. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sainsbury's was changed by I have a dig bick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897095 on 2018-01-07T19:31:04+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Walsall, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Walsall was changed by I have a dig bick (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95758 on 2018-01-07T19:32:32+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)