User talk:I would be bias if it was allowed

Welcome!
Hello, I would be bias if it was allowed, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 10:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Grammar advice
OK, that was the formal, template driven welcome above, but this is a piece of direct personal advice. Your username really is a bad one. No doubt you're trying to be clever. That can sometimes work, but on a fairly serious site like Wikipedia, I wouldn't recommend it. More importantly, "bias" is a noun, not an adjective. Maybe that distinction doesn't mean anything to you, but I can assure you it makes you look to most English speakers like someone who is very bad at writing (and probably speaking) English. The correct form of what you appear to trying to say is "I would be biased if it was allowed". I strongly recommend abandoning this user name, and inventing a better one. (NOT what I just wrote.) HiLo48 (talk) 10:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * And how would I do that? I managed to make a typo probably because of phone autocorrect being dodgy and whatnot. I am a fluent English speaker and speak it as a first language. I would be bias if it was allowed (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I have some difficulty regarding someone who uses bias as an adjective as fluent in the language. You can just abandon this user name, and invent a better, simpler, more sensible one. HiLo48 (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * And I asked, how do I abandon it? 120.21.234.249 (talk) 07:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Just stop using it. HiLo48 (talk) 07:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not logged in rn as I'm accessibg from phone Gmail but how the hell you do it? Where do I find it 120.21.234.249 (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hi I would be bias if it was allowed! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Australian Labor Party several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 07:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * you seem to be a decent person, similar to myself, even same city. But I'd rather you yourself getting a consensus, as multiple people have complained about the ideology and you are the one preventing it from being changed I would be bias if it was allowed (talk) 08:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm in the process of filling a report for you violating WP:3RR at WP:3RR/N. I suggest you self-revert. The current ideologies/political position might have some people disagreeing with it, however there have been many more saying any change needs consensus and you can't run roughshod over those just because you prefer your version. Tarnished<b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 08:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. <b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b><b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b> 08:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)