User talk:IaJewel

August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to House rabbit, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: House rabbit was changed by IaJewel (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8601 on 2011-08-21T05:59:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:00, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flemish Giant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Flemish Giant was changed by IaJewel (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939106 on 2011-08-21T08:35:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Simple Boba.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 08:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flemish Giant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ~ Red Rover  (Talk to me!) contribs  08:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Flemish Giant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not remove existing, well sourced, content. Simple Boba.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 09:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 09:34, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

The issues I can see in your edits are:

Thanks Alanl (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You try to change too much per edit and don't give a descriptive edit summary. Your edits look very like page blanking; a very common form of vandalism on wikipedia. Don't bite off more than you can chew at once.
 * Your statements do not have any citations; please refer to the wikipedia policies on verifiability and citations. In particular you should refer to third party sources such as books on rabbit keeping. If you need help with citation details, you can ask me on my talk page.
 * Don't get involved in an edit war; if someone else reverts your edit, ask why at the user's talk page.