User talk:Iaicanwin

December 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tablighi Jamaat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:19, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tablighi Jamaat was changed by Iaicanwin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86427 on 2018-12-12T19:19:22+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tablighi Jamaat. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please see MOS:PBUH Ifnord (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tablighi Jamaat. PLEASE SEE MOS:PBUH. Ifnord (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tablighi Jamaat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ifnord (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Dont edit/change any other religious matters.
Hey man dont ever try to make any wrong edits in Tablighi jamaat Section. Hope you got this. Or else there will be a some strict actions against you. Try to be in your limits. Dont get involved in a religious mattter. Regards Jayzeekay (talk) 02:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Editi warring at Tablighi Jamaat
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2018 (UTC)