User talk:IamOn2U

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Mark Simone has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mark Simone was changed by IamOn2U (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894143 on 2014-01-08T15:06:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mark Simone, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Sum mer PhD (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mark Simone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mark Simone was changed by IamOn2U (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95292 on 2014-01-10T21:55:47+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Simone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sum mer PhD (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mark Simone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. PLEASE discuss the issues on the article's talk page. Sum mer PhD  (talk) 01:14, 11 January 2014 (UTC)