User talk:Iamamoron!

File source problem with File:Channel 9.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Channel 9.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Iamamoron! this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Channel 9.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Channel 9.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

DWDM 95.5
Can you find sources that DWDM 95.5 returned on air? Superastig (talk) 04:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: SkyCable edits
Why did you reverted my edits here? I have reverted the edits of a vandal which he claims that NBN and IBC has been rebranded to "Channel 4" and "DZTV" respectively and you have reverted it to the vandalized version. -WayKurat (talk) 06:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Ahem
Edits like this will not be tolerated. Never attack your fellow editors. If you do it again, you will be blocked from editing. Got it? ⬅ ❝Redvers❞ 09:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -WayKurat (talk) 10:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

7-day block
for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Note to other admins
Feel free to modify this block without contacting me. PhilKnight (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

My False Edits
I admit that I am vandalising DZTV-TV. I just invented that idea.

I have now extended your block for a month from today for block evasion using an IP address to edit this userpage. Ged UK  09:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

ABOUT THE BLOCK CONCERNING THE BLOCK EVASION
Iamamoron! (talk) 11:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)I have used the same IP address that I did not know that it is mine. I did it because I am blocked during that time.Iamamoron! (talk) 11:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, you edited Wikipedia during a block using an IP address. That is block evasion, hence the extension. If you wish to appeal, use the template as you did before, and another administrator will review it.  Ged  UK  13:12, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I have now blocked you indefinitely as you have again edited your userpage using an IP. Editing using IP addresses while blocked is block evasion, and you've now done it again. As before, if you wish to appeal, use the unblock template above. Ged  UK  09:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Am I still blocked?
Hello, administrators and to those who blocked my before, ONE QUESTION FOR YOU: AM I STILL BLOCKED?


 * Yes, because of your repeated block evasion. If you wish to be unblocked, use the unblock template that you used before. Ged  UK  12:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)