User talk:Iamcalebhaskell

Nomination of Caleb haskell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caleb haskell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Caleb haskell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of "Unapologetic Bitch"


A tag has been placed on "Unapologetic Bitch" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JTtheOG (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of "Unapologetic Bitch"


The article "Unapologetic Bitch" has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable record by non-notable artist (see Articles for deletion/Caleb haskell). The claims of significance aren't credible. For instance there's no link to any of the reviews and Google in fact finds nothing once you filter out the links to the Madonna song (also called Unapologetic Bitch). The Billboard website has also never heard of this record and the claim that the record charted in the UK is similarly dubious and unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 16:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)