User talk:Iamicekid

Nomination of Daniel Keys for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Keys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Keys until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 21:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:21, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked you for two reasons:
 * The first is that you created an article that contains claims that my research here showed were hoaxes, given the almost complete lack of results for the performer. There's just no way that someone who has hit Billboard's Canada Hot 100 twice, signed to a major label, and been played on major music channels would have no results on the Billboard, label, or music channel websites showing that his music charted, released, or was played.
 * The second is that you appear to have created a second account,, in order to edit the article you posted in the mainspace. This account was also used to remove the AfD template. Given the similarity of the names, the obscurity of the performer (per the Google results), and that they've only edited Keys's mainspace and draft article, it seems likely that this is you.
 * I'm also concerned that your only edits have been to try to put this person on Wikipedia. You've been at this since 2014 and since then you haven't provided a shred of evidence to back up the claims. There is a chance, albeit a small one, that you might be unblocked but you would have to show the following:
 * That you understand the reasons for the block and will not do these actions in the future.
 * You will not try to add Keys to Wikipedia in any format, nor will you try to create other hoaxes.
 * You will show us how you would edit Wikipedia if unblocked.
 * If you can satisfy these requirements you might be unblocked. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:29, 15 June 2016 (UTC)