User talk:Iamin7ove

Hi,

I just read the entry on Kazuya Kujo on Gosick and there is some mistakes that I would like to draw your attention. Firstly, I do not believe that your braket information are useful on Kujo. So I will be removing those. Secondly, still in regard to those braket entry, you did not add space. Lastly, these sentences do not make sense

"...however(capable of delaying and sometimes, even going against on par with lethal armed opponents)."

Against who did he fight on equal ground? I do not remember Kujo winning any battle in particular... Glad to discuss with you on my talk page. Flowright138 (talk) (contributions) 13:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, in my opinion, being able to fight a bigger guy with a big weapon such as a halberd with brass knuckles is impressive enough right? He only loses to the guy later because he dropped his knuckles somewhere. But oh well, if you really don't agree with me on the matter then it's okay. It was really just on a whim. I know realize that the setting of gosick isn't exactly consistent, especially on characters. I was already thrown off by how much an airhead Kujo can be despite being a successful transfer student that boasts about his knowledge sometimes... My name is 1340 (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think we should write things on a whim. It is suppose to be objective. At no part of the series I believe that Kujo is an airhead - true he might shout over thousands time Victorique name - other than that, he is not stupid. Flowright138 (talk) (contributions) 07:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep talking on your page because I have your profile on watch - or talk on mine (then you have to watch me). It avoids me flipping from talk page to another. I will read your comment later tonight and do use colon as you can indent the text to make reading smoother. Oh, don't forget to sign your post with the four to Sign your posts. Flowright138 (talk) (contributions) 02:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know why you keep defending him. The guy is a complete typical airhead main character where the only thing that makes him a main character in the first place is cliche' things like fateful meetings. Really, outside his above-average-a-little physical strength, he's a complete airhead. Come on, agree that the whole series consist of only airheads outside Victorique. I mean, who wouldn't realize that the wire WITH BLOOD ON IT and HANG IN-BETWEEN TWO TREEs is a deadly trap. And pls, dont say that those days people aren't familiar with detective novels. If someone comes up with that trap at that age, there have to be someone else also at that age have to understand it.

Btw, why are you reminding me of signing my post? I didn't forget before o.o. I have experience with this kind of textbox.My name is 1340 (talk) 05:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The reason I remind you to sign is because on my talk page, it says "Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamin7ove" So it was not signed manually. Anyhow, I agree that anyone would have thought up the blood on the wire (you talking about the arc where Grevil accused him as the killer right?). To be honest, I don't remember how the criminal was arrested. Also, I don't quite remember the hang in between two trees case - what episode was that? I am not taking his side or anything, but if you put him as airhead, then every anime character is an airhead. I don't think it's a very useful/beneficial description; not to me at the very least. Flowright138 (talk) (contributions) 00:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmm...did I put he "can be an airhead" or he "is a typical airhead"? Anyways, I didn't 100% indicate he is airhead kind of character. What i meant to say was that he occasionally is portrayed to be an airhead. Btw, I didnt mean stupid. I just mean he is easily distracted by the situation, making him unable to think straight or reactly properly. iamin7ove 00:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Ambition of Oda Nobuna, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 19:43, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)