User talk:Iammaisiecatherine

June 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Orwellian—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * How is an egregious, politically charged attack on a sitting president “constructive?” Iammaisiecatherine (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The comment I deleted offers ZERO academic value to the discussion of Orwell. It was merely an attempt to publicly air a political bias. Iammaisiecatherine (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Showing how a word is used shows what that word means. Why is it relevant if someone currently occupies an office? If someone were no longer a sitting president, then it's okay or something? ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Even though "[r]emoved egregious, politically charged attack on a sitting president was not exactly a policy-based argument, Iammaisiecatherine's edit was definitely not vandalism. I have reverted again, with better arguments. If someone wants to re-add the comment, they should open a discussion at the article talk page and be prepared to explain how this one example out of thousands is particularly helpful for understanding the topic. Politrukki (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)