User talk:Iamrede2da

Speedy deletion of Steven W. Craddock
A tag has been placed on Steven W. Craddock, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt(t)(c) 05:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Steven W. Craddock
Given your request at the article's talk page, I have moved the contents of the above article, which was speedily deleted for failing to assert notability, to User:Iamrede2da. You are welcome to work on it there and bring it in line with policies before re-establishing the article.

In order to create a policy-compliant article about this individual, you'll need to be able to assert notability per Wikipedia's notability guidelines on biographies, which will mean utilizing reliable secondary sources, like newspaper articles. An article of this sort would be covered by Wikipedia's guidelines on "biographies of living persons", which in part urges editors to be extremely careful not to include any information that isn't sourced, even if it's true, and also reminds us that biographies particularly must be written from a neutral point of view.

If you have any questions about these policies, please feel free to contact me at my talk page or to ask assistance at Wikipedia's help desk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)