User talk:Iamthemuffinman/Archive 1

July 2012
If you continue to revert, you will likely receive a block. Acalamari 19:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Iamthemuffinman, it ceased being a legitimate debate when the insults and personal attacks started, which was from the first post onwards. Start a new section if you want a civil discussion on the matter. Zazaban (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What's the point? It's clear you don't wish to discuss it, it's clear that you were ridiculing the IP and it is absolutely clear that you don't give a stuff about the matter, why waste my time? What a joke. You, and every editor responsible for removing that debate should be ashamed. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The IP was hardly being ridiculed, and people were actually being incredibly patient with them. It was explained to 2.99.69.69 several times about why the Norway shootings were left out this year, why the Colorado shootings will be left out next year, and it was explained to the IP why their tone and language were inappropriate. If 2.99.69.69 had started the discussion without assuming some sort of wrongdoing on the behalf of others I suspect the thread would still be continuing. Acalamari 19:51, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
 * I sincerely do encourage you to start another discussion if you're willing to take a more civil tone than the last one had, although I disagree that there is bias. 9/11 was missing two years in a row, and not a peep was heard, and I find that the main page is just as likely to have a large proportion of British content. There is generally an Anglosphere bias, of which the United States is over 60% of. Zazaban (talk) 19:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The topic is finished and I am not prepared to discuss it further on my talkpage. Use the Ani thread if further discussion is required. As for 60% of the Anglosphere, I do not consider the US to have a connection to the Anglosphere after the revolution, you didn't want us, you shouldn't be a part of our legacy. But that is soapboxing and another matter altogether. Please stop using my talkpage for this matter. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Anglosphere as in english-speaking world, English being the language this wikipedia is based on, hence the bias towards it. Also, I am Canadian, so not included in that "you." As requested, will not come here again unprompted. Zazaban (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Please don't misunderstand me, it's just this matter that is annoying me (not as much as the edit conflicts), if you feel I should be brought up over anything then please feel free to drop me a note. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Pardon me then, I'm a compulsive conversationalist. Farewell until there. Zazaban (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Block templates
Regarding your edit to User talk:Abitoby, users are permitted to remove block templates from their own user space, see WP:UP. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 09:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * My bad. Apologies Iamthemuffinman (talk) 10:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries - have a look at WP:UP as it outlines what has to stay. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, I've been looking for that, thanks very much Callanecc Iamthemuffinman (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the barnstar - my pleasure, feel free to ask me if you have any problems or questions in the future. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Just a note
Hi Iamthemuffinman, as you know, I was the first person to post to your talk page and it was to do with blocks. I would like to clarify, although this could be difficult bearing in mind that you were the recipient of the note, that my message was a warning to you not a threat to block, and that I would not have blocked you as I had already participated in the discussion and I reverted you, so a block from me would have inappropriate (well, I think it would have been anyway). I'm not sure if this will mean much, but I'd thought I'd mention this to you anyway. I'm happy to clarify further if you wish. Best. Acalamari 22:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I hadn't given it much thought but thanks for the clarification :) Iamthemuffinman (talk) 07:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:AndyTheGrump, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. "....We are all Kosh...." <-Babylon-5-> 12:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks such as this. Personal attacks are not tolerated. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Again, please explain and. As it stands right now, I find it very hard to believe that you wouldn't be blocked for that alone. --MuZemike 13:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * here here and here. Not that it matters, they want me blocked. To hell with it Iamthemuffinman (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * What I am trying to say is that two wrongs do not make a right. AndyTheGrump has already been blocked for his userpage vandalism against you – that doesn't allow you to do the same. That is why both of you have been blocked. You're a little newer here, which explains why the length of your block is shorter than Andy's. Both of you need to stay far away from each other when both of your blocks have expired. --MuZemike 13:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * MuZemike is pretty much accurate here; I've blocked Andy for two weeks, given that he's got a long record of things like this. You, as a newer person, have a mere 24 hours out. But you're both acting like idiots - and if I see you engaging in this sort of behaviour again your block will not be the sort of thing you walk away from. Same goes for him. Ironholds (talk) 13:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh so andy can have a history of this crap, yet I retaliate and I get a warning for an indef? I really love the fair, equal and level headed fashion in which you administrate this website. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 13:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You were blocked only for 24 hours, AndyTheGrump for 2 weeks. --MuZemike 13:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Whatever. Get off my page now. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 13:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh look! More lies and personal attacks from andythegrump right here. But 'cos it's andythegrump and you are absolutely not on his side whatsoever they'll just be allowed. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 13:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Iamthemuffinman, since I left a message on AndytheGrump's talk page I think it's only fair I do here as well. I've created a sort of timeline on my talk page if you want to have a look. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 14:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The accusations and lies continue on his page. I highly suggest you get the Checkuser nobody has consulted me about done, then get the warnings for personal attacks issued. I look forward to seeing people eat their words. Oh lord you can't imagine how funny it will be. Get on with it. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 15:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Iamthemuffinman, you still have about 10 minutes to go. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The notice stated that the block would expire at 13:09, the time on my computer, my kitchen clock, my mobile phone and xbox all state that the time is now 13:55.