User talk:Iamure

Pasting copyright material into Wikipedia
I note that you have removed the deletion message from User:Iamure. I have restored it; unless you follow the procedures at Donating copyrighted materials it is a copyright violation to have this text here, and it must be deleted. Please also look at the FAQ page for organisations. Text from an organisation's own website is unlikely to be suitable for a Wikipedia article about that organisation; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a means of advertising. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iamure


A tag has been placed on Iamure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John of Reading (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note that assertion of permission to use material is not enough. Also, even if the copyright issue were resolved, the promotional tone of a company or personal website is likely to be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view, and an organization's own website is likely to contain a level of detail inappropriate for an article in a general encyclopedia. Wikipedia should not be treated as a noticeboard.


 * Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There is more detail at the WP:FAQ/Organizations and WP:Notability (organizations and companies), and good advice on how to write an acceptable article at WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, don't create articles on your main user page. Please use a sub-page, such as User:Iamure/pagename (replace 'pagename' with whatever article title you want). But be sure you don't put any copyrighted information there either, regardless of whether you have permission. Wikipedia, not you, needs the permission, by an official verifiable communication. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:08, 13 September 2011 (UTC)