User talk:IanChris948

Edit Warring on Masonic conspiracy theories
Please see our 3rr policy... edit warring to retain some bit of text in an article is considered disruptive and can result in your being blocked from further editing. If someone reverts an edit you make, don't just reinsert it ... instead, discuss the situation on the talk page of the article and find consensus. Blueboar (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

"What is against Truth, Cannot be Just"  Saint Augustine

Censorship has no place on this forum. As an Honorary Royal Arch Freemason I know for a fact some of these conspiracy theories have more validity than the organization would want to acknowledge. People should know the Truth about Freemasonry;   the Truth which Masons worldwide are bound by oath to keep secret. I can testify in court of corrupted law or biased judgement how my fellow brethren commit murder, how they profit from committing murder, and how they make it appear completely legitimate. My real name is at the top of the Masonic Black List and you are censoring me because of the fact that my knowledge is the biggest threat to the organization because as an Honorary Freemason, I am not bound by oath to keep anything secret! --ACE 13:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * It is not a question of "censorship". It's just that wikipedia is not the appropriate venue to do what you are trying to do (please read: WP:Tendentious_editing)
 * There are several problems with the material that you wish to include... First, in the context of the article, your material is a nonsequitur... You seem to be saying that we can not trust denials by Freemasons because they are obligated to lie. The problem here is that the article does not mention denials by Freemasons.  Thus, you are inserting a rebuttal to something the article does not even discuss.  Second, your statement actually disrupts the purely descriptive tone of the article. There is a reason for this tone... Wikipedia policy insists that we maintain a neutral point of view.  The article intentionally avoids any and all discussion about the truth or falsity of the theories discussed... It simply gives a coldly descriptive account of what various conspiracy theorists say (supported by citation to where they say it).  It does not try to "prove" that the theories are true... nor does it try to "prove" that they are false.  It simply lays out what they are.
 * Hope this clarifies why the material you wish to add does not belong in the article. Blueboar (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * On a completely different topic... how does one become an "Honorary Royal Arch Freemason"?... (I have never come across the term before, and so I am curious). Blueboar (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

One becomes an Honorary Royal Arch Freemason by being the direct victim of a brother Royal Arch Freemason; denied Judicial and financial recourse for the injustices which a brother Royal Arch Freemason has inflicted with malice and intended to destroy one's life; by using the same Luciferian Eye which the highest Degree of Royal Arch Freemasons use in secret but without being blinded by the Luciferian Light; and by learning their most intimate secret doctrines while hunting them down like  vermin. My Uncle was a Royal Arch Freemason. When Marvin Gay shot his father, my Uncle posted his bail. The individual that gave my Uncle the collateral for that bails-bond, killed a close friend of mine whom I was the Beneficiary for and in doing so they stole everything I had and would have received thus denying me what was rightfully mine. It took me 4 years to pinpoint the person responsible. The authorities refuse to acknowledge me because the District Attorney for the County of Los Angeles happens to be a fellow brother Royal Arch Freemason. And the fact that Freemason are obligated to do and say WHATEVER it takes to divert attention away from alleged criminal activity they know their brethren are guilty of, is a fact they the entire Organization of Freemasonry fights to keep a secret.--ACE 19:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I asked. I don't mean this disrespectfully... but you might want to speak to a psychiatrist rather than a DA.
 * And by the way... If you want people to take your story seriously, it might help to get your facts strait... Marvin Gay did not shoot his father, Marvin Gay was shot by his father. Blueboar (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Exactly .... so you must have known my uncle, Joseph Velarde....--ACE 00:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no. Never heard of him before. (and to be bluntly honest, I wish I had never asked).
 * To sum up... I do hope you now better understand why we reverted your edit.  It was nothing personal, nor part of any plot to "censor" you.  We are just following wikipedia's rules as best we can.   And please... don't tell me that the Royal Arch Masons are secretly manipulating Wikipedia or something like that.  That would really go too far.
 * I wish you well in your crusade.... but leave it out of Wikipedia please. Blueboar (talk) 02:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Alejandro (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MSJapan (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MSJapan (talk) 23:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC) Sorry, but you're going to have to take your Masonic conspiracy theories elsewhere - you can't use Wikipedia to publish them. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2012 (UTC)