User talk:IanMCo

Welcome!

Hello, IanMCo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to AE Smith does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

User talk:Drmies/Archive 36
I undid your edit as it is to an archive and Drmies is unlikely to read it. You should add your text to User talk:Drmies Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see my edit summary. A list of "notable associations" is not usually of encyclopedic value, and without references to reliable sources it's little more than a list of accomplishments only of value in PR. The same with the green fleet and the Ronald McDonald house: all of this (and none of it was properly verified) is great for PR but not for an encyclopedic article. Drmies (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)