User talk:Ianeke

Hi!

Your addition to the Fermi Paradox page, while appearing well meaning, should not go in Wikipedia. It looks like original research, and this is not what Wikipedia is about. Since the Fermi paradox is not resolved, the article tries to explain briefly all viewpoints, not come to any conclusions. Also, since it's an encyclopedia, each reference should point to an external publication of each idea. So the best thing to do is get your essay published, preferably in a peer-reviewed context, then add the relevant idea to the Wikipedia article, with a reference to the third-party publication.

The "shells of detectability" might go well in one of the earlier sections to illustrate a few points - if the earth's radio emitting lifetime is short, the ring is quite narrow (100 years has been suggested), and that for longer distances, the emitting civilization may not be there when the radiation is detected. LouScheffer (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Lou

Your comments and points are well taken. My addition is, I believe, an original interpretation to the Fermi Paradox, and is part of a larger study that I am circulating for publication elsewhere. I want to point out that the likely existence of ETCs throughout time and space is not necessarily inconsistent with our current lack of evidence for this existence, and that our attitudes have a basis and bias within our historical context. I hope to elicit comment from Wiki readers of this entry. If you can suggest other forums, please do.

File:Shells of Dectability.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shells of Dectability.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 00:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Milky Way Dart Board.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Milky Way Dart Board.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 01:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)