User talk:Ianjameskidd

Your submission at Articles for creation: Havi Carel (philosopher) has been accepted
 Havi Carel (philosopher), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SportingFlyer  talk  07:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Havi_Carel_(philosopher) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Thomas (philosopher) (October 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Thomas (philosopher) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emily Thomas (philosopher), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emily_Thomas_(philosopher) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emily_Thomas_(philosopher) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Emily Thomas (philosopher)


Hello, Ianjameskidd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emily Thomas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Intellectual Vices
Vice epistemology is the philosophical study of "intellectual vices" - negative traits of intellectual character such as arrogance, dogmatism, close-mindedness, incuriosity, intellectual cowardice, intellectual greediness, and other vices of the mind. It is closely related to social epistemology, which studies how social practices and institutions influence the ways people think and reason, and to virtue epistemology, which studies the virtues of the mind, such as curiosity, inquisitiveness, insightfulness, intellectual courage, intellectual humility, reflectiveness, and thoughtfulness https://academic.oup.com/monist/article-pdf/99/2/159/8031931/onv034.pdf<>.

History
The earliest systematic studies in vice epistemology can be found in the work of Francis Bacon. Many of the Idols of the Mind described in his book, Novum Organum, are intellectual vices https://chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7208/chicago/9780226116419.001.0001/upso-9780226116396. We find similar studies in the philosophical writings of Mary Astell, John Locke, and Mary Wollstonecraft, and other natural philosophers of the period. Most of these philosophers were interested in intellectual vices in relation to natural science, education, or feminist social and political projects.

The contemporary discipline of vice epistemology emerged in the 2000s as a natural complement to the discipline of virtue epistemology, which started to emerge during the 1980s with the work of Lorraine Code and James Montmarquet. Some of the most important contemporary vice epistemologists are Heather Battaly, Quassim Cassam, and Alessandra Tanesini https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686520.001.0001/acprof-9780199686520-chapter-4. The only current book devoted to the subject is Vices of the Mind: From the Intellectual to the Political by Cassam, which defends a position called obstructionism, according to which intellectual vices are character traits, attitudes, or ways of thinking that tend systematically obstruct the gaining, keeping, and sharing of knowledge https://global.oup.com/academic/product/vices-of-the-mind-9780198826903.

Some main topics
Most work in vice epistemology falls into three types: foundational work on questions like 'What is an epistemic vice?' and 'What makes an intellectual character trait vicious?', studies of specific vices, and applied vice epistemology, which uses vice-epistemic concepts and resource to understand intellectual problems in domains like politics, education, science, and the media.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vice epistemology (September 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vice epistemology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vice epistemology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vice_epistemology Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Vice_epistemology reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Vice epistemology concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vice epistemology, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vice epistemology


Hello, Ianjameskidd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vice epistemology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:12, 3 April 2020 (UTC)