User talk:Ianmdonnelly/sandbox

Amrprix (talk) 23:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)AMRPRIX (Alice Price) The Jack of Diamonds Lead seems overly short. You are adding more content, so make this give a better sense of the significance of this group. This is a really important group--but you are not diving deep enough. I think you can go much further with the body without much effort! You should do some more research--this is a start. Here are 3 more sources, but I want to see you find some of your own too! Sharp, Jane A. "The Russian avant-garde and its audience: Moscow, 1913." Modernism/modernity 6, no. 3 (1999): 91-116. Warren, Sarah. "Crafting Nation: The Challenge to Russian Folk Art in 1913." Modernism/modernity 16, no. 4 (2009): 743-765. Mudrak, Myroslava M. "Russian Artistic Modernism and the West: Collectors, Collections, Exhibitions, and Artists." (1999): 467-481.

BrianE22 (talk) 19:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC) After Peer Reviewing your article these, we're the main points. Lead: Overall, I think what you added is helpful to the article, I think your lead is concise and doesn't put too much information on the table.

Content: The additions you added were concise and neutral, I think the overall additions you did helped me understand the article more. You didn't use biased sources or lean towards one side. There weren't any significant grammatical or spelling errors. Overall, I think the content added creates a better flowing article, this is a good start. Hope to see more sections and information added to help me understand the article more.

References: Overall, I think the reference you used is great, but possibly in the long run of our edit you could try and dive into a few more to help pull information from multiple sources. The sources being current is great though.

Overall, I think your article is coming along well, can't wait to see the finished product. Great work.