User talk:Iazyges/File PROD

what do you think of the current proposal? This is my first time writing an RFC, so I want to make sure it's good. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  05:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think a word or two about FFD in the Background section is needed. I'm not sure if the average RfC participant knows that FFD is the only place to deal with these non-Commons files, and that if the files were on Commons, they would be (largely) eligible for speedy deletion there. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  21:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

@Iazyges: apologies for the delay, somehow missed your ping. IMO you don't need to define 'unencyclopedic' or 'vanity image', because that is already covered by WP:NOTWEBHOST. I'd suggest simplifying the proposal in that regard, and focusing more on how the process of File PROD would be introduced and/or implemented. For example you could say that File PROD may only be used for scenarios where the copyright of the file is not being called into question, and that it would be a similar process to WP:PROD, WP:BOOKPROD. - F ASTILY   01:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * My bad also, after talking to BU Rob for a bit, we decided to change it a bit, see here. -- Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  02:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It looks great! I'm looking forward to seeing it go live :) -  F ASTILY   02:47, 30 January 2017 (UTC)