User talk:Ibjaja055

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055

Thank you for creating Waja People.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much
 * Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055

Thank you for creating Tomb of Muhammadu Attahiru I.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055

Thank you for creating Adamu Abdu-Kafarati.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055

Thank you for creating Bubayero's Tomb.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055

Thank you for creating Lamurde Hot Spring.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Navigation
Hallo, Thank you for creating Hey You (2022 film). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Hey You), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find the new article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. Pam D  19:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055

Thank you for creating Shalewa Ashafa.

User:Reading Beans, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joy Odiete has been accepted
 Joy Odiete, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Joy_Odiete help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Reading Beans (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. This is a good news! Ibjaja055 (talk) 17:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Names of AAS fellows
Hi, thanks veyr much for creating articles for important AAS fellows. I have noticed that you are using the naming as in AAS website which starts with Surname. I have now changed the name of these articles to thier name following conventional naming

Toure Moctar is now Moctar Toure, see this and his google scholar account.

‪Andriambololona‬ Raoelina is now ‪Raoelina Andriambololona‬, see his google scholar account.

Youdeowei Anthony is now Anthony Youdeowei, see his and this. FuzzyMagma (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I will stick to the conventional naming. Ibjaja055 (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Ibjaja055! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:01, Monday, November 21, 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much. Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Mohamed Thameur Chaibi moved to draftspace and others
Hi, I have moved couple of articles to the draft space before it gets deleted + they are not yet suitable as written to remain published. I would recommend adding more to the articles which can be easily found online. These articles can also use some proofreading before being published. I understand your ambition but I really think these scientists deserve better coverage/article and it is better to spend time on making an article good in the draft space before rushing to the mainspace. I will come back to help improving these articles before re-publish them.

list of the articles that I have moved: PS: as I am not familiar with politics, so I restricted myself to science as I know well that these scientist biographies can be assembled from reliable sources online. These are champions of science in their countries and Africa, at least they deserve a good WP. Yours FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Mohamed Thameur Chaibi (copy edited the text, kept well referenced informations, add more about his research and education, and fix the infobox you should use scientist infobox and not academic infobox as you need to describe the field + you like to use the word member when these are fellows)
 * ✅ Driss Bensari (similar to Mohamed Thameur Chaibi. one useful trick, go for source edit, copy everything to a word document and then run Grammarly or word review for basic copy editing.)
 * ✅ Ramjugernath Deresh (added more references, when you start and article as a DRAFT, wikipedia suggests sources. that is why I suggested you should start with a draft before jumping to main space. I see you did not do that for your recent two articles although I, and many other editors, recommended doing that. Please consider taking this advise. AAS is a good source but you sometime miss different aspect of the person work when your story is narrated/derived from one source)
 * ✅ Mohamed T. El-Ashry (+ added a section called see also, it will give a chance to link articles together so they will not be orphan, I will also look to these scientists' organisation to link them)
 * ✅ Aster Gebrekirstos, minor edits mostly in line referencing and copy editing.
 * ✅ Yehia Bahei El-Din (mainly copy editing + citation, I removed the mention of NASA award as I did not find any NASA related website that confrims this beyond what is written on AAS website)
 * ✅ Ashraf Mansour (expaned the article but one questions that bugs me is why did you make this article to start with)
 * ✅ Gombe Samson (his name is the other way around, the date of birth was wrong and referenced to a site that does mentioned anything about his death, you tend to group reference which once checked one by one you will find only one actually give a reliable reference, It will be better if you can stick to referencing each information separately if you can, so it can be easily corrected)
 * ✅ Farida Fassi Added more references and more sections (+ fixed broken references, added a note, change the infox to scientist include the field, copy editing to use her last and remove mention of professor, for full details see here)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svgal Fayçal
 * Bunmi Adelugba
 * Cyrill Nunn (wrong infox is being used, need alot of copy editing + a free picture can be found + the references does not include many that go into depth about his education, work and personal life)


 * Thank you. I hope you will not forget them in the draft. I will also try to improve them. Bunmi Adelugba is not an academic, she is a politician and a public office holder. The article should be stubbed rather than moved to draft Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, most of the articles drafted have been reviewed by four or five different reviewers. Drafting them will only give two of us the chance to incubate them but stubbing them can give many editors the chance to add more to the articles. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 we are on this together brother. And I might disagree with you 2nd assumption especially because that why we are building these articles because no one ever thought about doing that .. but time will prove one of us wrong .. FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes brother! Most of these scientists have been forgotten and I hope that more hands like us will assist. So what is the conclusion now? Allowing them to be stubbed or leave them in draft. Seriously, even some of the administrator that I feared most have reviewed the articles. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 give me a week on the draft space and then let’s submit them for review (not moving them directly back), just to get a 2nd opinion on how to improve them FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It is a good idea brother. Thank you for your time. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:55, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 Hi I have done two and described above what I have done, please check them and have a go at Bunmi Adelugba and Ramjugernath Deresh and I can have a look when you are done before we sumbit for review. FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I have checked them and I have gotten the logic. I will also try it tomorrow. It's already late here Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, thank you Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * using Grammarly on mobile phone is a little bit frustrating. Ibjaja055 (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 no worries. I can do that for you. Let me know when you want me to proofread and copy edit FuzzyMagma (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I am learning a lot from this collaboration. Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar and I really enjoyed reading your new article, Abdellatif Berbich FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You are highly welcome @FuzzyMagma Ibjaja055 (talk) 10:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your efforts on the articles. I am still trying to find my way around starting with the draft. I am learning a lot from your edits. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * What I do most of the times is to create the draft in my phone notebook before creating the article. For every I create I have the draft in my phone. there are some information that I never thought are essential but looking at your edits, I realized I have been missing vital information. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks brother, it’s a learning process to be honest. And I really admire your passion. To start with a draft article, you can make a to do list in your talk and then use followed by Draft:TheTopic and then close the prac, e.g.,[[Draft:Sudanese National Academy of Sciences FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Check this draft https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aster_Gebrekirstos Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @FuzzyMagma Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good .. will benefit from copy editing which I will do tomorrow in grammaly + creating an info box. But content wise this have more ‘meat’. Btw I looked to the articles that you have created - which is alot! - but 1/3 of them is un-assessed, sup and start. You have 1 C article. I’d recommend trying to at least upgrade 50% to start and 25% to C.
 * last thing, I saw the delete notification on your pictures which something I expected, I would recommend chatting with person who flagged them to see what you can learn from that mistake. There is the option of non-free image upload but that also applies to specific situations/images
 * all and all .. love your dedication bro .. FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Forgot to mention, @Ibjaja055 can we try to finish the articles on this list by this week so you can go back to your routine of daily article creation FuzzyMagma (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem, I will work on them this week In Shaa Allah. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @FuzzyMagma I have worked on this Farida Fassi Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. I will chat him up. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @FuzzyMagma Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I went through Draft:Aster Gebrekirstos, It is really good work. I have done some inline citation (for FAAS and FTWAS). My inclination is to cite whenever the information can be sourced to a one reliable reference, and group references when the sources are not very reliable but more than one is saying the same information. But overall, you are making strides my friend. Amazing work FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I will stick to that, thank you. @FuzzyMagma Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 can you please have a go at fixing Ashraf Mansour's article. A quick warning, there is alot of information about him in the internet and everyone will appreciate if his package act as a summary of all of the reliable information about him available online. Good luck. I will come and review it once you are done and add more from the Arabic sources. He is a well known name and done alot scientifically and politically so make sure that is reflected in his WP. FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

I am trying to but most of the references am seeing are linking him with GUC. I barely see good reference that talks about him. Ibjaja055 (talk) 15:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Ibjaja055 ok no worries. I will take care of this page then.
 * do you fancy editing Cyrill? FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Let me check for additional information Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Ibjaja055 not only new information but also copy editing FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:37, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 I have finished my part. That was a good collab. the major thing that I have learned is that AAS and TWAS are not reliable sources. They copy and paste things without checking. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the collaboration. I really learnt alot. Now, I have 7C articles. Thank to you Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:59, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @FuzzyMagma Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:59, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 glad to hear that. Remember it is the quality of the articles and not the quantity. The articles below can use some improvement:
 * Stephen O'Connor (academic)
 * Khaleed S. Mekheimer
 * Yacob Mulugetta
 * TC.. FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 can I get your help on this deletion review FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Is it that the category was deleted or the article was deleted? Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 the category. Some admins previously discussed deleting sub-categories of Order of merits that relates to African nations and decided to delete them and give each nation one category. While UK have almost 32. I discovered this and re-initiated the discussion pointing holes into their arguments but "Abundance overcome courage" FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kibaku people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hausa and Kanuri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Short descriptions
Thank you for adding Short descriptions to articles. However, many of these descriptions have started with a lower case letter or have been too long. Please read the guidelines at WP:SDFORMAT — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 19:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Jharana Das

 * Thank you very much for this update. I am very happy to see this. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2783 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I am very happy to have been considered worthy of this precious prize. Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 congratulation brother, It is beautiful that your work is finally being appreciated. FuzzyMagma (talk) 09:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you brother @FuzzyMagma Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:36, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Quentin Oliver Lee
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Ibjaja055. Thank you for your work on Gino Landi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   07:17, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nduka Otiono, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elayne Jones
The article Elayne Jones you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Elayne Jones and Talk:Elayne Jones/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CurryTime7-24 -- CurryTime7-24 (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Ibjaja055. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Happy Palace Group of Schools
Hello Ibjaja055. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Happy Palace Group of Schools, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. BangJan1999 22:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your observation. The article has been deleted three times check . Also, Wikiwriterforal has submitted it to AFC up to four times and it has been rejected for NPOV. Lastly, not only that the article failed WP: GNG it also has a very low reliable media coverage. Speedy deletion might have gone too far, thank you for giving us the chance to discuss before any action @ BangJan1999 Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Vytautas Katkus Citation tag
Hello! I just added a reference to all unsourced materials (especially in the nomination and awards part). What do you think about it now and how could I improve my article and remove the tag? I am still new to the english platform, I am super open to feedbacks! Thank you in advance,

Best,

Antoine AntoineČiobreliai (talk) 08:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for drawing my attention to how you have expanded the article. The stub tag has been removed. @AntoineČiobreliai Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Improvement For Article
Hi, can u please help me of improving my article about the song I've created im dedication is creating article for Bodo song's and Bodo artist's i have tried finding every notable sources I could and still finding please guide me and tell me wt should I change or improve. XERI MUSIC (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @XERI MUSIC Thank you for reaching out to me. Also, I am impressed that's you want to add more to the world; f creativity. Kindly read through this [] to know more about the Notability of music on Wikipedia. Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @XERI MUSIC Also, I discovered that in the article that I rejected, you didn't make use of headings. I will make use of them using the draft as case study. Pls check and be making use of it in your subsequent submissions Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

How you dey?
Ibjaja, how far nah. E don tey wey speak. On a side note, did you know that fellows of the Nigerian Academy of Science are notable? Best, Reading Beans (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @Reading Beans Am good o. I just dey gentle o. Yes, I have had some issues with them but the consensus is that the fellows are notable. The fellows are elected based on the contributions of scientists in Africa. It is also part of the Notability guideline of WP: Academic but it shouldn't be the only source, there should be other sources too that can confirm his/her scholarly contributions. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but, how can someone be elected a fellow without having sources that can help them establish Wikipedia notability? *Wink* Reading Beans (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Reading BeansAt times, it can happen. What I discovered over the time of creating articles around them is that they preferred featuring in peer reviewing journals rather than news coverages. smiles.. My conclusion on that is that maybe because journals further elevates their status in the realm of academics. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It’s fine sha. Jisike. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 21:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Reading Beans I do not speak Igbo o but translator has helped my life. You almost confused me, I have been trying to decode jisike in English. Good luck too. Ibjaja055 (talk) 22:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Elayne Jones
The article Elayne Jones you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Elayne Jones for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of CurryTime7-24 -- CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Request on 19:07:52, 6 October 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Editor guy1975
Kindly provide reliable references to your draft before resubmitting it. Thank you

Thank you for looking at my article
Thank you for looking at my article but not sure why you added orphan tag to Market Square clock tower as it was linked yesterday here: Coltman C411978 (talk) 11:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @C411978 Thank you. I have removed the orphan tag. Ibjaja055 (talk) 17:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Warhammer: Age of Sigmar - Realms of Ruin
Hello Ibjaja055,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Warhammer: Age of Sigmar - Realms of Ruin for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Warhammer: Age of Sigmar - Realms of Ruin to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @Illusion Flame Thank you for reaching out to me. I recently moved the article to draft before I discovered the rest of the drafts and disambiguation. I should have tagged it for speedy delete instead of moving to draft. Ibjaja055 (talk) 22:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No, what you did was appropriate! All I did was tag the redirect you left behind. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Next time you can use this tool! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much@Illusion Flame Ibjaja055 (talk) 23:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Notability of Your Favourite London Sounds
Hello. May I ask why you added the notability tag to Your Favourite London Sounds? I accept the subject is quite niche but I believe it passes the notability criteria of WikiProject Albums. It uses fifteen secondary sources; most are direct coverage of the release, including reviews and analysis from The Guardian, Los Angeles Times and NPR. There is also material from The Chicago Tribune and The Wire. I believe the article demonstrates notable coverage. --TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)


 * @TangoTizerWolfstone Thank you for the clarification. However, majority of the references are not accessible either they are subscription based or google books. You have two The Guardian sources and one can be considered as a reference because the other was not talking about the subject. I think we should give a chance for another reviewer to review it. Thank you Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:56, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for getting back to me. I feel, per WP:PAYWALL, that the newspaper.com sources are fine. Ditto the Google books. I may take this to WikiProject Albums for further opinion. Thank you. TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @TangoTizerWolfstone You are highly welcome. Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello Ibjaja055:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

 * @Hey man im joshThank you so much. I really appreciate the bar star! Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Hey man im josh My request for renewal of New page reviewer has been pending for days. I want to participate in November backlog but I am unable to do so because the tool is not working again. Can you help me to process the request. Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Ibjaja055. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 19:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @HJ Mitchell Thank you very much Ibjaja055 (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Wao! So it is a year already since I received this precious award. Thanks @Gerda Arendt Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 07:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Ibjaja055,
 * Please remember to sign all comments, not only on Talk pages but also on Project pages like AFD deletion discussions. Otherwise, editors have to look at the page history to see who posted a comment. Thank you. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 07:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Liz Thank you very much. It might have skipped my mind. I will go through my contributions and make the adjustment. Ibjaja055 (talk) 10:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Vanderwaalforces (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Adding template
Hello Ibjaja055, just want to let you know that when adding templates, there's no need of adding the Template: prefix if you're using the curly brackets ( – ), for example, just do and NOT. Many thanks :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I have fixed Talk:Olugbemiro Jegede, Talk:Sunday Iyahen‎ and Talk:Peter Okebukola. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vanderwaalforces Thank you very much for the correction. I am still trying to find my ways around templates. It took me several hours to be able to even create one. LOL. Thank you once again Ibjaja055 (talk) 12:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 Hehe, please tell me how I can help, are you trying to add that template to all the articles created at WikiProject AfroDemics?
 * Also, I have few observations, instead of adding the Wiki Afrodemics Project Articles to the main articles as you did here, we could just add the category inside this Template:WAP so that whenever the template is added to the talk page of any of the articles, the category is automatically populated with the talk pages of the articles, instead of the main pages. What do you think? Because it doesn't appear to make sense to add the main pages unless you want to make the category a hidden one.
 * Can you do that? I could help if you want. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vanderwaalforces That's a little bit technical for me. I would really appreciate if you can help me and teach me later. Thank you very nuch Ibjaja055 (talk) 12:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Vanderwaalforces Yes, I am trying to add the templates to all the articles. Ibjaja055 (talk) 12:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 Okay, please hold on and do not add the category to articles for now so that you don't have to undo many edits. I will make some edits to the template and the category will be populated by the article's talk pages it was added to. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ibjaja055 I guess I didn't spoil things. You can now go ahead and add the template to the talk pages and don't bother to add the category to the articles directly. I will also assist in adding the category to the articles. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @VanderwaalforcesThank you very much. The magic is working perfectly. Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No problems :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:30, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Sheila Gestring
When adding sources exist to articles in the future, may you please insert a refideas template on the talk page with those sources? Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I appreciate your correction. @Mach61. I have added to my Wiki Knowledge Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

The Nigeria Barnstar of National Merit

 * @Vanderwaalforces Thank you very much for this barnstar. It means a lot to me and I appreciate your countless efforts to make Wikipedia a better place for volunteers. Ibjaja055 (talk) 11:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gwandara people


Hello, Ibjaja055. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gwandara people".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 20:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Emmanuel Osinem
Hello, Ibjaja055. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emmanuel Osinem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ikenna Dieke
Hello, Ibjaja055. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ikenna Dieke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter
The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer, who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:


 * , with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
 * , with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
 * , with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
 * , with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
 * , with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
 * and, both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

New pages review
Hello. How long does take for reviewing of new pages? Just I am waiting for this. My new pages: Dmitrii Adamov, Azamat Akhmedov, Aznaur Tavaev and Ruslan Belkhoroev -- @Ibjaja055 Ricco Baroni (talk) 15:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter
The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:


 * , who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
 * , who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
 * , who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
 * , who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
 * , who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
 * , who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to, who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:


 * with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
 * with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
 * with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
 * with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
 * with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Help with my biography draft
Hello Ibjaja055,

I saw you've successfully created a lot of articles, I would appreciate it if you could help me, look over my newly created article draft on a Nigerian film director Dare Olaitan. I need some help in checking for any errors I may have missed or any unreliable information in the article.

Thank you for your time. Aivrie (talk) 19:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for reaching out to me but I don't usually check draft based on request. I check draft based on the logs that we have at hand. Ibjaja055 (talk) 09:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Saadatu Hassan Liman
Hello, Ibjaja055,

Thank you for creating Saadatu Hassan Liman.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Hi Shefiu, thanks for creating, kindly categorise and deorphan."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Editing a page for Nenad Vorih
Hello :) Its me. I gathered a couple more sources from the local library. I believe that there is more than enough to edit and resubmit the page. I am simply putting forth the the same question about the nature of your rejection so i can make necessary changes. Was it any particular source that you took issue with in terms of credibility ...maybe the playboy articles? I almost didn't include them but they were actually very insightful and well written so I figured who am I to judge? I have found two more from visual art centric magazines so I dont need to include them anyway. Also before I do the edit I wanted to check in about the notability issue that you raised in your comment to the other editors notes. I was under the impression that seven sources would be more than enough to pass notability requirements. Please explain or provide additional details regarding how i can address that objection. the guy is a famous painter. i didnt even include all of the online articles that could be referenced as most say the same things. Thanks again for all of your help :) I very much appreciate your assistance. MorriconeEnnio (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
 * with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
 * with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
 * with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
 * with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Tainted Canvas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tainted Canvas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tainted Canvas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. signed,Rosguill talk 20:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:


 * with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
 * with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
 * with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
 * with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Francis Igbasan
Hello, Ibjaja055. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francis Igbasan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Olubukola Babalola
Hello, Ibjaja055. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olubukola Babalola, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)