User talk:Ibne.adhi

Do not remove tags like, , etc without fixing the problem
Greetings, do not remove warning tags unless you resolve the issue. You have been removing tags from articles which are still clearly biased, or have many errors in organization and/or grammar. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

POV in Muhammad Muslehuddin Siddiqui
Greetings, I'll quote below just a few examples of phrases which would have to be revised to remove bias:
 * He made a revolution through his ethics, discipline wisdom knowledge. (Says nothing actually factual, all opinion)
 * these all were no doubt unmatchable Sholars of Islam, consisting the ocean of knowledge, well acquainted and on the other hand having the student like Qari Muslehuddin having the vast thirst of Knowledge and wisedom, and now who can estimate, what the teachers granted to him and what he conceived ? (Completely unacceptable, literary-style praise. Not factual reference-book material.)
 * devoutly religious and pious, marvelously attractive (Members of opposing sects would probably disagree)
 * After downfall of Hyderabad  (Some would say "downfall", but many others would argue it's a good thing. Neutral wording must be used.)

Again, I'm not saying that the above are wrong or lies, simply that other intelligent people could easily disagree with them, as as a neutral source of knowledge Wikipedia should report only the facts, and let individual readers decide what is good and bad. It is fine to say "Tom Smith's funeral was attended by 10,000 people, and was a front-page story in the New York Times." But it is not acceptable to say "Tom Smith was a wonderful man who was loved all over the world." Makes sense? Feel free to write if you have any questions about making the article more neutral, which is essential to maintaining it's international credibility. MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Greetings, I agree that POV (point of view) has been substantially reduced, and thus have removed the tag "pov". Copyediting is still needed, but your work to remove sectarian bias is greatly appreciated.  I remind you, however, that honorifics including "A.S", "aleyi al-saleem", etc. are not used on Wikipedia, nor is the term "Holy Prophet".  Again, I emphasise that this is not done out of disrespect for Mohammed, but in order to maintain neutrality and credibiltiy.  For example, if a follower of Prophet X were to describe him as "the most amazing prophet ever", followers of Prophet Y would discount the article as being inaccurate.  So we are not necessarily saying that praise of Mohammed is wrong, just pointing out that it is not objective from  global perspective, and that the individual reader should be left to decide for himself as to how he should view individual religious figures.  The article is much improved, though there is still some room for copyediting to make the article clear to novice readers not familiar with the subject.  Thus I have removed the "pov" tag to reflect improved neutrality, but left the "copyedit" tag to note that clarification is needed.  I'll do some myself, and leave the tag to others may help.  Remember:  all Wikipedia articles are works in progress.  Thanks again.  MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Response to Thanwi criticism
Greetings, I've posted a response at Talk:Ashraf_Ali_Thanwi, since this issue is probably good for broader discussion, and also to make sure any agreement is public so that other editors (who haven't seen our individual discussions) don't just re-create the debate. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


 * IRT your suggestions: if the Ahmed Reza fatwa is the most notable fatwa against Thanwi, quoting briefly from it would be appropriate.  I would't quote an entire paragraph due to space issues, but a sentence like Barelvi theologian Ahmed Reza Khan issued a fatwa of kufr against Thanwi, alleging that Thanwi's beliefs...  That way there is full context (that ARK issued a fatwa of kufr), and quotes that any neutral party would agree fairly represent ARK's overall statement.  It's not that summarising is inherently wrong, it just has to be done in a neutral way, so that any judgements are clearly the judgements of ARK, not the editor's opinion of Thanwi.  Oh, and please remember to footnote the quote from the fatwa, stating what book it came from.  Just include proper footnote notation (author, title, publisher, and date/location of publishing) between tags. MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Greetings, I was just wondering that how can I quote Quran template, as I have seen on a page it was quoted and linked to the external page for a translation, if I want to quote translation directly from True Quran Project, how could I insert in an article. --Ibne Adhi (talk) 21:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * See, or Template:quran-usc. The instructions for using are there.    Fl ee tf la me   ·  whack! whack!  · 22:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Regarding edits on Salah
Hello, and pardon me for not making my edit summary explanatory enough! To elaborate, the conclusion drawn by the original text was unsourced to begin with, and unless it is sourced soon will likely be deleted. Your inclusion of the quotation from Sahih Muslim would have been entirely appropriate if it were referenced in the cited source, but as there was no cited source it instead simply became ad-hoc primary source justification for improper synthesis.

Furthermore, the quote from a non-english source contains no notes on translation, which almost invariably leads to people who believe it to be translated differently complaining in the talk page that "This is translated wrong! It actually means this!" Thus making it material likely to be challenged, which should in accordance with our guidelines be sourced to begin with.

I hope that explains it sufficiently, don't hesitate to write back if you have further questions! Sincerely, Peter Deer (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

I want to add, criticism on the article Ashraf Ali Thanwi, and want to add actual context of his Fatwa which he gave, since there are few controversial Fatwa are related to him, and without quoting the actual text, one cannot get the actual idea, why Ahmad Raza Khan imposed fatwa of Kufr upon Thanvi.

I have been discussing with MatthewVanitas, but he is not allowing me to add the such context, I am afraid why neutral point of view is not been appreciated by Wiki Team, and removing my context after being neutral is considered to vandalism.

Appreciate your help in this regards --Ibne Adhi (talk) 11:38, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Adding criticism violates WP:NPOV and is not allowed. Please do not add such things into the article. Bejinhan  Talk   11:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you mean that you want to copy it from somewhere and post it into the article? Bejinhan  Talk   12:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you can't do that because that is violating our copyright policy. Please see WP:C for more information. Because of our WP:NPOV policy, your writing should be neutral. Bejinhan  Talk   10:05, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Durood-e-Tunajjina.png
Thanks for uploading File:Durood-e-Tunajjina.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Durood-e-Shafai.png
Thanks for uploading File:Durood-e-Shafai.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Durood-e-Nahariya.png
Thanks for uploading File:Durood-e-Nahariya.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Durood-e-Nahariya.png
Thank you for uploading File:Durood-e-Nahariya.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Salavat (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Manqabat-e-Qari Muslehuddin.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Manqabat-e-Qari Muslehuddin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 09:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Join us at FB
Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:
 * Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
 * Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: --  Captain Wikipedia!     ( T - C  - G  ) 13:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Muslehuddin Siddiqui


A tag has been placed on Muhammad Muslehuddin Siddiqui requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Summichum (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan


'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Manqabat-e-Qari Muslehuddin.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Manqabat-e-Qari Muslehuddin.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 12:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)