User talk:Ibuntie

Welcome!
Hello, Ibuntie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bhoomi film 2017, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Bhoomi film 2017


The article Bhoomi film 2017 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NFF with no sources confirming that film has commenced, just some "teaming up".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Legend Studios. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Legend Studios for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legend Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Legend Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not use thumbnails inside of infoboxesas you did to Utkarshini Vashishtha. Note that this is your second warning regarding this issue. Continuing to add thumbnails will be seen as disruptive editing. For more information please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE. When adding an image, instead of doing:

SomeImage.jpg

You can simply supply the name of the image. So in this case just do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:48, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Raaj Shaandilyaa and notability
Hi there, if the article you created on Raaj Shaandilyaa is going to stand a chance at surviving, you need to be sure that you've proper established the subject's notability. Please see our general notability guideline, which says:
 * "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."

Your challenge would be to demonstrate that the subject has received significant independent attention. Interviews would not suffice, as the content needs to be independent of the subject. As the article is so far, I don't think that notability has been properly established, and as such, the article is at risk of deletion. There were also numerous tonal problems that I fixed. The version that I first read really sounded like a puff piece written by a fan. Please avoid presenting subjective ideas as fact. Describing things as "famous", "well-known", "masterpieces", "important", "honour" is just really inappropriate for a neutral encyclopedia like Wikipedia.

Note also two other things, please: 1) If you are a paid editor, you have to disclose who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. See WP:PAID. 2) If you have a conflict of interest, for instance if you know Shaandilyaa, you are highly discouraged from editing the article, as people who have conflicts of interest are often incapable of writing objectively. I bring this up because of some of the problematic, fluffy language used in the article. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)