User talk:Icabod12344

Vandalism
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- VViking Talk Edits 14:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Frank Parlato, Jr., but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Suonii180 (talk) 21:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

BLP violations in WP:LEDE
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 05:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * That's interesting because it is a pretty relevant fact and I believe the information it is sourced from is reputable. This information is not defamatory. Nothing that has been included is false. Icabod12344 (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Next block will be longer
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * {{unblock|reason=The information that was the cause for this block is factual and relevant. This is not defamation and provides context given the subject's comments about this case up to its conclusion. This is censorship for a difference of opinion} Icabod12344 (talk) 17:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The issue is putting "felon" in the second sentence of the article. Per WP:LEDE and WP:BLP, that's not appropriate unless the person is known primarily known for a crime. There is no censorship here; the article already contains a "legal" section (albeit a poorly-written/WP:SYNTH one). OhNo itsJamie  Talk 17:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Punitive measures are being taken because a fact isn't where it has arbitrarily been determined it belongs. Factual and cited information is allowed just not when someone doesn't like it there. Icabod12344 (talk) 18:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * You seem to have created this account for the sole purpose of casting the subject in a negative light, as evidenced by your first edit and your subsequent edits that have introduced an opinionated slant and WP:SYNTH issues into the legal section. The next block for BLP violations will be indefinite. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)