User talk:IceBlade710

Leakylifeboatboys
The article Leakylifeboatboys has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

User Page
IceBlade: It seems that you made a change to my User page that was not authorized and disabled the animated user boxes there. Please undo whatever change you made that disabled the animations on the user boxes. Zlykinskyja (talk) 19:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I only deleted the box that said you were waiting for someone to delete it. Try clearing your browser's cache, which browser do you use? They animate for me. IceBlade710 (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Cotton Gin article
I saw your revision of the cotton gin article, which I agreed with, by the way.

I was curious, though...you included an address to a Wikipedia misconceptions page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_misconceptions

The only entry in the "misconceptions" article I could find which might be relevant to the cotton gin article was the part that pointed out that Eli Whitney didn't invent the concept of interchangeable machine parts. Was that what you had in mind? Ormewood (talk) 02:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I misread your revision...the text originally said that the gin was created in 1793, then patented in 1794...you altered it so that it said that it was patented in 1793, then left the statement that it was patented in 1794 in place. I reverted it back to the original wording.

I still don't get the reference to the "List of Misconceptions" article.Ormewood (talk) 22:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


 * That was so long ago, I do not remember it quite clearly. I'm sure that whatever you have changed is acceptable. I do however remember that I wanted to change the statement of Eli Whitney being the inventor of the cotton gin, as he is not.IceBlade710 (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)