User talk:IceWalrus236

Original research and production companies
I saw that you changed some content in the infobox at Muppets from Space. Per this consensus, production companies should be explicitly identified as such by reliable sources. This is to prevent original research in identifying which companies listed in the billing block are distributors, which are production companies, and which are contractually obligated to appear without being either. Variety is usually a very good source, but when their reviews simply reproduce the billing block, causing the same original research problem. One could pick companies from the billing block and argue that they belong (or don't belong) in any of the fields. When the companies are explicitly labeled, like AFI does, it is more useful than scanning the billing block and deciding which ones to include yourself. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! —Compassionate727 (T·C) 16:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Puss in Boots
While I understand your intentions may have been to make Puss in Boots look like other film articles, please keep in mind a few things. First, only the primary genre should be in the opening line per WP:FILMLEAD. Also, we should avoid long strings of individual links per WP:SEAOFBLUE. You can review other style guidelines at WP:MOS and MOS:FILM. If you have any questions about this, please discuss your concerns at the article's talk page. Avoid back-and-forth reverting, which can be seen as edit warring and is not permitted. Don't hesitate to contact me as well if you have any general questions about editing on Wikipedia. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 00:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

RE: Just clearing up a recent edit...
I undid your edits because you added All Movie as source, and it is unreliable. You can restore all you want, but you can't add All Movie as source. According to WP:FILMLEAD as well, sources aren't welcome at the top of the articles. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 15:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Huh. Last time I recalled, AllMovie was listed here as a suggested source, and GoneIn60 also told me it was one as well according to his talk page. IceWalrus236 (talk) 15:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok. Sorry for making you dizzy, you are right. In any case, All Movie can't be sourced at the lead due to WP:FILMLEAD. Tajotep (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * : Then how are we supposed to (properly) cite genres? IceWalrus236 (talk) 15:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know, but take a look on, for example, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (GA and it doesn't cite genres). Same as Jaws (FA and it doesn't cite genres). Sometimes the genre can be discussed, but if you add the genre without sources, it's allright too. --Tajotep (talk) 23:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shrek the Third, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I'm getting a bit tired of explaining to you that you can not remove sourced content from Wikipedia simply because you disagree with it. When a source says something, you can't simply remove it and the sourced content.  Instead, raise the issue on the talk page and get consensus. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. The reason I swapped the source in the first place was because AFI listed DreamWorks Animation as a distributor, which was completely incorrect. Paramount Pictures was the sole distributor of the film (well, until 2014, that is), so I used a source for the Shrek the Third page that reflects this. Just wanted to clear that up. IceWalrus236 (talk) 14:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JumanjiTheNextLevelTeaserPoster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JumanjiTheNextLevelTeaserPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JumanjiTheNextLevelTeaserPoster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JumanjiTheNextLevelTeaserPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Redirects
Per WP:NOTBROKEN, please don't override redirects, as you did in. These redirects are useful and should remain. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Columbia Pictures films (1930–1939) (October 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Columbia Pictures films (1930–1939) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Columbia Pictures films (1930–1939), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Columbia_Pictures_films_(1930%E2%80%931939) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Columbia_Pictures_films_(1930%E2%80%931939) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Columbia Pictures films (1922–1929) (October 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Columbia Pictures films (1922–1929) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Columbia Pictures films (1922–1929), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Columbia_Pictures_films_(1922%E2%80%931929) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Columbia_Pictures_films_(1922%E2%80%931929) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Return to Never Land. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * infobox film is pretty clear about this. If a source says that "X" is the production company, that's what Wikipedia says.  If the source lists some other company as "in association with" or "presented by" or whatever else, that does not necessarily make the other company a production company.  If it were a production company, it would be listed as such. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I just did some research and remembered to add the proper sources for the additional companies this time around. IceWalrus236 (talk) 13:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Shaggy Dog (1959 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Walsh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Les Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D23.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)