User talk:Ice Cream Action

February 2021
Hello, I'm BusterD. I noticed that you recently removed content from Queens without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BusterD (talk) 19:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 08:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Snow Bros., you may be blocked from editing. Namcokid 47  20:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Fantasia (1940 film). Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)