User talk:Icedearthman

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Engraving has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=440698433).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

welcome
Hello BRIADRIAN, and welcome to wikipedia!I hope you enjoy yourself. here are links for newcomers


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia


 * How to edit a page


 * Help pages


 * Tutorial


 * How to write a great article


 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~) ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.again, welcome to wikipedia-Abomasnow (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Now05ster (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Engraving. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Engraving, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Engraving was changed by Icedearthman (u) (t) deleting 11190 characters on 2009-02-05T18:27:18+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Engraved (band)
Please don't remove the content of an existing article. I have taken the material you had tried to add to Engraving and moved it to Engraved (band). While you will have to add reliable and verifiable sources to support a claim of notability, please use this article to edit, not the one about engraving. Alansohn (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Engraved the band
A tag has been placed on Engraved the band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Engraved)
A tag has been placed on Engraved) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I've noted the "hangon" tag you've placed on one of the two identical articles you've created about your band. You may want to read through [WP:MUSIC, which contains the criteria against which articles about musical groups are measured.  I can't find any evidence that this group comes close to meeting any of those standards, and so I've decided to agree with the editor who tagged the article for speedy deletion.  If you have any questions, you might also read WP:Why was my article deleted? or some of the other useful links above. Accounting4Taste: talk 23:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)