User talk:Icer 51020/sandbox

Peer review Positives:
 * The layout of your article is extremely clear, with defined and separated headings.
 * The 'contents' list is very helpful in navigating your article, it also shows good knowledge of wikipedia itself.
 * Likewise the inclusion of the image which shows the categories of education in China.
 * References are from a number of various sources meaning variating opinions are discussed about your topic.
 * Additionally, the use of the number system when referencing again shows skill when using wikipedia.
 * Detailed level of research is shown through the vast number of sources, images and links to other sites of information.
 * Your introduction briefly describes the articles aim, whilst outlining everything you will be discussing.it makes it extremely simple for the reader to grasp.
 * Points which are made are neutral and most sources are factual information.

What could be improved:
 * Your article mainly reads well, just in a few sections there are SPAG errors, for instance in the third line of your opening paragraph.
 * Additionally, in your 'what did the government do' paragraph- the part regarding what the project did (reference 6) does not grammatically make sense.
 * maybe try to add different point of views, from varying sources for example.

Overall the article is very good, after reading I understand the topic and have a good level of knowledge surrounding it, maybe just proof read.