User talk:Icertis Laura

Funding Section And Tag Removal Request
Hello! I'm here to address two issues. First, I see that user:Hipal has added a tag to the page that says it's "written like an advertisement." While I agree that the page isn't in ideal shape, I have been trying for the past couple months to improve it by proposing content that uses secondary sources and an encyclopedic tone. For reference, here's a link to what the page looked like before I started placing edit requests. I have a conflict of interest, so I know there's a degree of skepticism around my proposals, but, as you can see above, user: Heartmusic678 has approved my infobox and History requests and user: PK650 has approved my Technology request. I would like to see the flag on this page removed, given that editors seem to think it's headed in the right direction, but I understand if there are parts that are still problematic.

Which brings me to my next suggestion: the removal of the Funding section. It's not terribly substantial, as it's primarily a list of funding rounds and investors, the most notable of which are now covered by the History section. If any editors agree with that assessment, could they please delete Funding? And if anyone has feedback or thoughts on my concerns about the tag, feel free to reach out. Thank you! Icertis Laura (talk) 20:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Icertis Laura. You should make the edit request on the article talk page.
 * In general, if you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. Use of your company's own press can be problematic. You may want to look at WP:GA and WP:FA articles for companies like your own to get a feel for what information is and is not included in such articles and how that information is referenced. --Hipal (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing this request as answered, per above. Icertis Laura if you have any questions, please go to WP:TEAHOUSE or WP:HELPDESK. Z1720 (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Icertis. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

~Kvng (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)