User talk:Ichibani

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! . Alphachimp 19:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

= Memos: =

Arthroscopy really ought to be updated
Needs to cover topics besides knee arthroscopy. Ichibani utc 17:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Unstub Pyloplasty
I had one I may as well write about it. Ichibani utc 17:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

= Messages =

Toolbox
No problem with the toolbox, I actually borrowed it from elsewhere. CASCADIA Howl/Trail 13:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
for letting me know about User:Tenisnut3. I am really not sure if they are sockpuppets because their edits are to tennis articles but the styles do not seem to be the same. But if you think they are, go ahead. I see that you have added a speedy delete tag to their Userpage. Is that accepted? - TwoOars ( T 03:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I saw your report at AIV. Your report seems to be based on User:Austinwoodtennis's userpage (which was deleted as db-attack). So I see that userpages can also be tagged as attack pages and speedily deleted. Hmm. - TwoOars ( T 03:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD close
Not sure what you're asking? AfDs can be closed anytime after 5 days, comments after that if they're still open are of course welcome, but once time's up they might get closed anytime. In this case it wouldn't make a tremendous difference, no consensus defaults to a keep anyway. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Generally would, but that one was an unusual case. The reason I closed no consensus there (aside from the fact that both sides had very valid points), was that it was brought up that time might make clearer whether the article should be kept or deleted, and there seemed a good chance that's indeed correct. Given that, and the good arguments on both sides, a no consensus close puts it to rest for now without prejudicing discussing it later if need be. It didn't look in this case like relisting would make a substantial difference. It's always a judgment call, of course. :) Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD
Oops. I didn't know what it was. When I clicked on it, it brought up HTML code in notepad. So I reasoned that you may have put it in there on accident. And I deleted your input unintentionall (I didn't scroll down far). I'll be more careful. Sorry! --Chris S. 06:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)