User talk:Ichika Kasuga/Archive 1

Content dispute on Spirited Away
Regarding your recent comment on Talk:Spirited Away as well as your edit summaries in the article: Please do not threaten other editors with blocking who are acting in good faith and providing sources to back up their position. I would decline a request to block that IP address with whom you are warring. I suggest you answer the counter-argument the IP address has given you rather than continue edit-warring in the article, on which I can enforce stability either by protection or blocking all parties involved. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:SPA & Editting Warring
By looking at your account history and contributions, your account falls well within the description of a single purpose account. This does not help you in your editting war with the IP on both articles Spirited Away and Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train. Augu❤Maugu 💕 05:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Your recent editing history at List of highest-grossing animated films shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Wrong. In the case of a content dispute when each side has sources supporting their position, not only can you be reverted, but you can also be blocked for edit-warring. Do not edit-war, even if you believe you are right, and even if the person you are warring against doesn't follow the rules.
 * I have protected articles to avoid blocking you, to force discussion to the talk page, but you keep finding more articles to engage in edit-wars. You are being reverted by multiple editors, not just one IP address. You are not listening to what others have been telling you about why your changes are problematic. From my perspective as an administrator, the surest way to ensure stability of articles is to block your account. Enough! If you continue revert-warring, you will be blocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

It's look like you have misinterpreted me. I haven't done anything after Betty has revert back my all edits. I just asked him the reason behind his reverts. You can personally check my edit history if I did any kind of edit warring in last 24 hours after his reverts. Personally, I am quite disturbed by the way you have warned me. As you know that I have not edit warring after his reverts. Currently, I am standing away from this topic as my edits always seems to be problematic to you all. So, I haven't edited in last 24 hours. I am a peaceful and a little boy who is just waiting for his placement. You all can say that I am the only one who ignore you all. But the fact is that I have not edit warring after you have asked me not to edit in content dispute. I am just waiting for a person to check whether my references to my statement in the talk page of the anime film Demon Slayer Mugen Train is correct or not. Nothing further to say. You are a Adminstrator and I am a editor. I respect you all a lot. And I hope you all do not think that I have disturb you. Thank you. &#91;&#91;User:Ichika Kasuga&#124;Ichika Kasuga&#93;&#93; (talk) (talk) 08:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * My first comment above was a very mild warning about edit-warring, and you were still doing it at least six hours later in other articles. It is true that you have not warred since someone else issued you a more formal warning above, and I apologize for my oversight in not noticing that. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * This has been explained already: the problem is not the sources, it is your interpretation of them. In that sense your statements are not well sourced, because they do not corroborate these other grosses. They do, however, arguably corroborate that Demon Slayer did indeed break the record for highest-grossing anime film. Betty Logan (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I am becoming increasingly tired of your disregard for Wikipedia's sourcing policies. Once again you removed secondary sources and replaced them with a link to another article. You have already been told this is not acceptable. WP:CIRCULAR (a policy) explicitly states "Do not use articles from Wikipedia (whether this English Wikipedia or Wikipedias in other languages) as sources. " If you cannot follow simple instructions even after they have pointed out to you then maybe you should consider whether Wikipedia is the right project for you. If reliable secondary sources exist that corroborate the new figure THEN ADD THEM TO THE ARTICLE YOU ARE ALTERING! Do not ask editors to go chasing up sources at other articles. Betty Logan (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merrick Park. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Two noticeboard discussions about issues you have been involved in
, I have posted to WP:ANI and WP:NORN about our discussion at Talk:List of highest-grossing R-rated films. See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and No original research/Noticeboard, respectively. TompaDompa (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Ichika Kasuga. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know why you emailed me to ask me to review your block, you were blocked by GeneralNotability. I think you have got off lightly with only a week, just do your time Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Noting for the reviewing admin that Ichika Kasuga has emailed a number of admins asking for unblock. As for the merits of this...both the IP and this account have acted as if something the other said/did was them, so I'm reasonably confident in leaving the block. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * For the record, I did not receive email from this user, only a request to review the SPI on my talk page, which I did. In my view, and, I think indef is excessive. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Let me say this, Logging out just to vandalize an article and making a harassment other people is simply not very cool on Wikipedia. It is just making everyone look very bad on you. However, You need to think about your edits before publishing it on articles. Whatever you edit will be on a history logs and the other editors can see it.
 * If you use multiple accounts that is just to harass other people. They will do a CheckUser on you and they will know that you are a sockpuppet. I know that you are very upset at something but YOU NEED TO STEP UP AND GO DO SOMETHING.
 * Thank you for your consideration DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

WP:PLAGIARISM on Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba the Movie: Mugen Train
This edit of yours copied a rather lengthy passage verbatim from https://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-news/2020/12/17-1/thr-pulled-monster-hunter-film-delays-demon-slayer-mugen-train-anime-films-chinese-release.

The source said [...] Chinese entertainment company Bilibili has picked up the film for a wide release in the region after streaming the Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba TV anime series as it aired in 2019. According to THR, Bilibilli was planning to have the film release in late December/early January to beat the Chinese New Years' lockout in early February for foreign movies, meaning the film might be delayed to March.

Your edit said Chinese entertainment company Bilibili has announced to release the film in the region for a wider audiences after streaming the Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba TV anime series as it aired in 2019. According to THR, Bilibilli was planning to have the film release in late December/early January to beat the Chinese New Years' lockout in early February for foreign movies, but the film was delayed to March, [...]

The 45-word passage after streaming the Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba TV anime series as it aired in 2019. According to THR, Bilibilli was planning to have the film release in late December/early January to beat the Chinese New Years' lockout in early February for foreign movies is exactly identical in the source and your edit, and the rest was only minimally altered. This is not okay. TompaDompa (talk) 19:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Link20XX (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

 * @NinjaRobotPirate: I exactly do not know why you have disable my email access. This is something I understand when you blocked my email access because I was writing to lot of admins, requesting unblock or spaming their inbox with my email. いちか かすがt@lk 05:27, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
@Yamla, I apologise for the automatic archive. I configured the bot wrongly. I am sorry for my mistakes.