User talk:Ickyfatang

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! §FreeRangeFrog 04:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of System of Ascending Precedents
A tag has been placed on System of Ascending Precedents, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. §FreeRangeFrog 04:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Original research
I saw your message on the talk page of the article you created. To answer your question, no, Wikipedia does not make provisions or otherwise accept original works. See this for specific information. Normally for articles like these, one needs to quote reliable third-party sources that attest to the notability of the subject. §FreeRangeFrog 05:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Your assertion that the text is unsalvageably incoherent implies two possibilities; either it is, or it's just over your head. My 18 year old son understood it perfectly - even came up with a couple of different examples of his own. I wonder if you really read it. You can understand why I am inclined toward the latter of the two possibilities. Maybe it's just never happened to you. This, however, is all academic since it is in clear violation of the ban on original material. I was astonished to learn this. What a waste.