User talk:Iconicironic

March 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aafia Siddiqui, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Aafia Siddiqui, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Your editing to the Aafia Siddiqui article violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In your latest edit, you cited to blogs, which are not considered reliable sources. This is your last warning. If you persist, you may be blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Aafia Siddiqui, you may be blocked from editing. Auric   talk  20:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Aafia Siddiqui, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Auric   talk  20:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Auric   talk  20:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Aafia Siddiqui shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)