User talk:Iconicmillyb

January 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Stokesley School, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  23:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Encyclopedic content
Your edit to Stokesley School was reverted for a number of reasons. Most importantly, you did not provide a reliable source for the content, or indeed any source at all. Wikipedia requires that all content be verifiable through reliable, independent sources. A contributor's personal knowledge isn't enough. In this case, at a minimum, you would need to provide a citation to, for example, a local newspaper. This leads to the second reason the edit was reverted: the event you described was not notable enough to be covered in an encyclopedia entry. School "controversies" that aren't so remarkable as to be reported on by an outside newspaper (not the school newspaper) are definitely not notable enough for Wikipedia. Since this was your first edit, you would probably benefit from to learn more about Wikipedia's standards and procedures. Best of luck -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  23:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)