User talk:Icontriboot

Deletion discussion about Conphidance
Hello, Icontriboot,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Conphidance should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Conphidance.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Conphidance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conphidance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Conphidance& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  So Why  12:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)