User talk:Icseaturtles/Archive 2009

April 2009
RE US Judge Edward Lodge and your response on "neutrality":

The truth is always neutral. Either do the research for yourself and prove me and all those who are doing and have done the research wrong, or leave the changes alone!

Your ASSUMPTION that the changes are not neutral and based upon fact - in the absence of any research whatsoever on your part - is the act of an uneducated ignoramous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Constitutionalist (talk • contribs) 21:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * If you feel that I reversed your section in error, then I encourage you to rework and incorporate references to support your claims. Wikipedia strives to maintain a neutral tone in its writing, and once more I encourage you to take a look at WP:NPV in helping with this. Also please note that Wikipedia also maintains a policy of WP:NPA, and it is in everyone's best interest to respect this.  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 21:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Got the help I needed

Thanks for the bailout with the dos vandalism turtles, I was trying to undo but couldn't keep up with the clown ;D Thoughtful Goose (talk) 09:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

No Probs
Anytime dude, I Really appreciate when people thank me for that cheers :D  Jamesööders (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
thank you for reverting that spot of vandalism to my user talk page whist I was offline, really appreciated. All the best SpitfireTally-ho! 08:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my userpage in return afterwards ! :) Neutralle 10:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem once again :) I think it is turning regular because we both battle vandalism at the same time. We might as well work together :D Neutralle 21:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Seriously
How many times have I been told to "refrain from vandalizing Wikipedia", and that "such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted"? Guess what. Posting those dumb warning templates and trying to scare me doesn't work. --221.220.178.189 (talk) 10:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Dagosocal
Hi, I think this users blanking of List of San Diego Gangs was because they have also created List of San Diego County Gangs, and they didn't want the first one any more. I have taken the blanking as a request for deletion. Kevin (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That's really weird I didn't catch that, since Huggle usually asks if the page should be tagged G7 when it is blanked by its creator. Nothing came up, so I assumed it was just a vandal blanking. Thanks for letting me know. -  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 05:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I also see you just beat me to removing the warning from their talk page. Thanks again. Cheers -  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 05:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Slander
That wasn't vandalism. That was a caption clarification. Please assume good faith and please don't bite the newcomers, per the policy of this 'pedia. Thnx. 69.133.98.118 (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I always try to assume good faith before deciding to revert suspected vandalism. Your edit to Sleep in my opinion appears then, and now to be misrepresentative of the actions being portrayed in the picture. I did not put a warning template on your talk page since I saw you had previous constructive edits within Wikipedia, and I was trying not to bite a newcomer/fellow editor with a previously constructive track record. I see that User:Hordaland did place a vandalism warning on your talk page for the edit which I reverted. If you still feel that your caption better suits the picture, then I would recommend that you bring the matter up for discussion on the article's talk page.

 Ic sea tur tles  ★ 02:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

It's a Pleasure


Tresiden (talk) has eaten your cookie! The cookie made happy and 'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!



Doniago (talk) has eaten your cookie! The cookie made happy and 'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

WikiProject User Rehab
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. -- Abce2 | Access  Denied  02:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

HEY!

 * No Problem.  Otis  Jimmy  One  01:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protect
Are you able to semi-protect U2. There have a lot of vandalisms there of late.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  04:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I see semi-protection has already been requested for U2 at WP:RFP .  Ic sea tur tles  ★  04:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Pioneer Square
FYI, the edits to Pioneer Place are spillover from Portland's Pioneer Courthouse Square. He's been a super-long-term sockpuppet. Here's more info: And sorry for causing him to head north! (erm, thought it was to Pioneer Square, not Pioneer Place) tedder (talk) 05:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse
 * Sockpuppet_investigations/Pioneercourthouse/Archive

WikiProject User Rehab
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines and cooperate with others, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. Abce2 | Access  Denied  02:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey man whats up?
Im kinda lonely will u help me get started on wiki? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.17.228 (talk) 05:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Im just wandering why do people do wikipedia
like what do u enjoy about wikipediaing? just wandering —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.17.228 (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

What is up man?
what up man im kinda lonly right now i live in california and my girlfriend just died and my best friend just commited suicide im kinda sad and shit but u know shit happens.lol do u believe in god?

Oh my
Where did these guys come from? I edit John Paul Tremblay and suddenly they're coming out of the woodwork! D:  Lychosis  T / C  06:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also thank you for your revert on my Userpage!  Lychosis  T / C  06:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, you're very welcome. They really seemed to love that picture; for a brief moment I too had a userpage plastered with it.  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 06:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Welp, let's hope we've heard the end of them for tonight!  Lychosis  T / C  06:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * They've been blocked, so it should hopefully remain quiet.  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 06:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Hi Icseaturtles! I notice that you and I have been reverting some of the same anoymous editors today. The one who was vandalizing the Wowowee article just got blocked, but only for 12 hours! I’ve never seen a blocking admin be so generous. Anyway, I wanted to mention to you, in case you did not know, when someone you are warning hits Level 4, you should go to WP:AIV to file a report so that they can get blocked. Thanks! (P.S. If there is any reponse, please repond here to keep the thread together. I will have your talk page watchlisted for a few days. Thanks!) —  SpikeToronto  07:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I did see that he was blocked. Since I generally use Huggle for counteracting vandalism it automatically issues a report to AIV when a final warning has been issued, and the user continues to vandalize. I issued his first, second, and third warnings, but never issued his final warning which was subsequently made by you. Hence, I did not file a report. Hopefully that clears everything up. Cheers and happy editing.  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 07:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I realize that now! Happy hunting! —  SpikeToronto  07:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

And thanks for the revert of vandalism on my userpage! I guess one of those I blocked needs revenge. I leave my page open for editing so that the vandals have something better to do than damage articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, and I like your strategy.  Ic sea tur tles  ★ 09:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)