User talk:Idahowines

Welcome!

Hello, Idahowines, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Idaho wine commission, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Teapot  george Talk  22:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Idaho wine commission


A tag has been placed on Idaho wine commission, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Teapot  george Talk  22:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

You don't get it. If you make a better proposal that convinces another administrator that you are here to edit constructively and abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it will be considered. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * You have not indicated that you understand the reasons you were blocked.
 * If you want to edit here, you must propose a username consistent with Username policy. You have not done so. Your username represents an organization, and that is one reason you were blocked.
 * You don't seem to be familiar with WP:CORP, which outlines the criteria for inclusion of an article about an organization. Your organization doesn't seem to fit the criteria.
 * The fact that you are a not-for-profit is irrelevant.


 * Okay, I understand what you are suggesting. If we were to change the name of the page to History of the Idaho Wine Industry would that better fit the criteria?


 * Also, can I change my user name to my name if it is not to be a company?


 * To your first question: An article such as you propose isn't necessary. You can simply expand the existing article Idaho wine by adding a history section to it.
 * To your second question. Yes, but you need to propose a new username as indicated in the big orange box at the top of this section. You haven't yet suggested a name. Also, don't separate the unblock template fields with slashes as you have been doing. Use a vertical bar. Like this:
 * ~Amatulić (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, to be frank, the continued use of the word we, both in the unblock request above and in subsequent comments, suggests a role account and does not help alleviate the inherent conflict of interest issues here. -- Kinu t /c  23:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)