User talk:IdenticalHetero

April 2016
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Okja a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. czar 20:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Fionn Whitehead listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fionn Whitehead. Since you had some involvement with the Fionn Whitehead redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Michael Reed (talk) 01:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Altered Carbon (TV series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altered Carbon (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Altered Carbon (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Cut & paste "move" at Altered Carbon (TV series)
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Altered Carbon (TV series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Altered Carbon (TV series). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. The correct course of action in this case was to ask either an Admin or a Page mover to move the Draft article to Mainspace, not to just "cut and paste" the contents over the redirect at Altered Carbon (TV series). Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐ ) 01:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kedar Williams-Stirling
Hello, IdenticalHetero,

Thanks for creating Kedar Williams-Stirling! I edit here too, under the username Domdeparis and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gary Oliver (actor)


The article Gary Oliver (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gary Oliver (actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Oliver (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gary Oliver (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 21:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

"Korr Sella" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korr_Sella&redirect=no Korr Sella] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 16:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)