User talk:Idonthavetimeforthiscarp

Welcome!

 * }

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/05/business/global/05numbers.html?_r=1

ATTIVISSIMO http://lescienze.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/maggio_2011,_n.513/1347688

Potential edit war
Concerning your announcement to add controversial content to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, please read the guidelines on verifiability and reliable sources, as well as on establishing and determining consensus. Cs32en  Talk to me  14:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

It’s not controversial, the author is a journalist who publishes on the Italian edition of Scientific American and collaborates with NASA, and I am seeing with an administrator the case for using his blog as a reliable source. Idonthav etimefor thiscarp 13:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

pls
Pls add reason when you put the notability template on pages. Thank you.Ozgurmulazimoglu (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I know that you "don't have time for this carp" (ahem!), but could you please take more care with edits like this one. I can see what you assumed it meant, but the original version was correct (it refers to the 90 minute length (i.e. 2 x 45 minutes), not the 1990s), and the altered version doesn't actually make grammatical sense anyway.

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)