User talk:Iexeru

Speedy renaming of category
Hi, please comment at WP:CFDS on whether you agree to renaming Category:Puzzles publisher to Category:Puzzle manufacturers. If you agree on that page, we can do it quickly; otherwise, it would require a full discussion at WP:CFD. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! – Fayenatic  L ondon 19:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of WOWCube for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WOWCube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/WOWCube until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:31, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, Iexeru. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page WOWCube, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
So all the votes in the AfD were office staff? what about User:Apristen, WOWCube office staff?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * No, I don’t know this account. I have more than 5 thousand followers on Facebook, and 30 thousand on Instagram. I regularly publish project news on Social Networks, probably this is one of our followers. In addition, our project has a contractors in Russia and Hong Kong, I do not control the personnel of the contractors, and I am not familiar with the majority personally. Our Office accounts are Vatono, Iexeru and R1200GSA. We realized that we can’t vote; our behavior is like a WP:Duck. Please remove the ban from me, I will not participate in the vote. Thanks.Iexeru (talk) 02:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I don't believe you. Apristen is likely a sock based on what you said. Your intention with Wikipedia has always been (for years) to promote your product or Osipov. We are not here to promote products; we are here to build a neutral encyclopedia. In any case, I am not an administrator. An admin will review your request shortly and they will decide if you should be unblocked. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:16, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * With all due respect. I do not understand the reasons for your mistrust. I write that I will not vote. I really won’t. Thanks. Iexeru (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * When you sockpuppet, and also meatpuppet in this case, you lose the trust of editors. Simple as that. You also waste the time of other editors in tracking it down. Your editing is largely all about promotion. I am just expressing my personal view; an administrator will decide if you should be unblocked. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * In any case, many thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. I really love Wikipedia and I think that it is arranged fantastically. If you do not think it is possible to unblock my account, please set a deadline for blocking. Infinity is too much. thanks Iexeru (talk) 02:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I received your email. You do not need to email me. I am just a regular user. Only an administrator can block or unblock your account. If you read the guide to requesting unblocks it seems like it is unlikely. But read the guide.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will read the guide. Iexeru (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Reviewing admin may wish to review this in context of my !vote and associated comment at Articles for deletion/WOWCube which preceded this unblock request. I make no judgement as to whether unblock should or should not occur, but this may help the admin determine context.  While I have been sent an email by this account it has been junked and I have not and will not be replying or communicating off wiki (which is my standard approach).  Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your time. I looked at the history of your edits, and votes. And I saw that you adhere to an objective and impartial position. As I said, I do not urge you to support us, I just wanted to draw your attention. Thanks.±Anna Pr (talk) 22:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I've disabled your access to Wikipedia e-mail because I've received complaints of your sending e-mail to users (including me) promoting your article.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Hearst Shkulev Digital for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hearst Shkulev Digital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hearst Shkulev Digital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Oliver Virk (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2022 (UTC)