User talk:Ifonlyalabama

PKK and Denmark
Hi, you deleted my edit on this post asking please not to remove sourced material. I do appreciate your point but I addressed this on the talk pages. Turkish authorities allege a link between PKK and Roj television but has been unable to substantiate that even in a thorough investigation by Belgian authorities. Furthermore Turkish domestic law is completely inapplicable - it's a Danish company, it only needs to comply with Danish, EU and international law. You can always find sources for inaccurate information. Why not remove material just because it is sourced when it is not relevant? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ifonlyalabama (talk • contribs) 01:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC).
 * I am sorry, but wikipedia articles are not about the "truth" but instead weather or not they comply with Attribution. Any relevant information from a reliable source is more than welcome. Weather or not Turkish domestic law has an application or weather or not this can survive a thorough investigation is completely irrelevant. -- Cat chi? 02:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * How is attribution more important than relevance and accuracy? I can tell you that the exchange rate today is 1 USD for 0.75610 EUR and I can provide an attribution that fully complies with the Wikipedia Attribution guidelines.  Does that make it relevant for this article? --Ifonlyalabama 01:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)