User talk:Igallards7

Welcome!

Hello, Igallards7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Aallasdfa67usgd60 (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Joe Gallardo


The article Joe Gallardo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 02:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Animal happiness certification
Hello, Igallards7,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Animal happiness certification should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Animal happiness certification.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Natureium (talk) 23:08, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Endemic gastronomy
Hello, Igallards7,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Endemic gastronomy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Articles for deletion/Endemic gastronomy.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Nicolas Simoes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolas Simoes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nicolas Simoes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Aditya Tiwari for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aditya Tiwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aditya_Tiwari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello Igallards7. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Igallards7. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Daiyusha (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'd like to know how you came to that conclusion that I have been paid. It is an accusation against me without any support. There is no correlation between my different edits on Wikipedia to establish that. Besides I am a staunch defender of Wikipedia neutrality and the dissemination of free knowledge. And no, I have not been paid or received any compensation from a natural person or organization of any kind to edit on Wikipedia. In relation to the article that you initiated the deletion discussion, I have placed enough reliable and verifiable references in said article according to Wikipedia standards, beyond the value judgments of each editor. Thank you! --Igallards7 (talk) 10:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This is just my suspicion, not a conclusion.I am just asking you to confirm clear mosconceptions . I am suspecting you because you created an article about a male not-so-popular non-Indian instagram model and then one more about a not-so-popular blogger in India. usually people write about popular things, or about "related" non-popular things. You are writing about non-related non-popular subjects. Daiyusha (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that information you have mentioned about Instagram is not relevant or encyclopedic, it is not even linked to his profile in that social network. The popularity or nationality of a biography is not a condition for the creation of an article in Wikipedia. Please remember that it is an encyclopedia and what Wikipedia is not. --Igallards7 (talk) 11:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * wrong word. I meant non-notable subjects. Daiyusha (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category for Sam Giles
You added a category to this article, but I can see nothing in the text of the article to support the category so I have reverted. Please do not add unsourced material, or unsupported categories, to the encyclopedia, and especially not to articles about living people. Perhaps you added the category from your personal knowledge of the subject, but Wikipedia needs independent reliable published sources. If you do know her personally, please be aware of the encyclopedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines too. Thanks. Pam D  08:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, I researched, found a source, added it to her article, and reinstated the category. But another time, please add the fact and sourcing to an article before you add a category. Not least because adding unsourced content (or category) to an article about a living person tends to cause other editors to wonder whether you are that person or their friend / family / colleague and so editing with an inappropriate COI. Thanks. Pam  D  08:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Swiss colonels has been nominated for deletion
Category:Swiss colonels has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Sandstein  07:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)