User talk:Igallegos1215

February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to WFQX-TV has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: WFQX-TV was changed by Igallegos1215 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956555 on 2018-02-01T03:07:39+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  L293D  ( ✉ ) 03:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ral 33 (talk) 03:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to KGBT-TV. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

January 2022
Stop your POV pushing at Democratic Party (United States). Three editors have reverted you, so do not edit against consensus. You cannot use a single opinion piece to make such a sweeping assertion. Cullen328 (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Do not add your personal opinions to articles, as you did by editing Canada to label it an "authoritarian dictatorship". Please read WP:NPOV. If you continue to edit articles improperly, you may be blocked. Schazjmd  (talk)  21:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:NOTHERE
Hi there. I've had the opportunity to go through your recent edits in Wikipedia. Up until January 24, 2022, you seemed to be focused on improving various television channel articles by updating the information in them. But starting on January 24th, your edits took a drastic turn:


 * On January 24, 2022, you edited the United States article, saying it was a Quasi-Authoritarian Regime, provided no reliable sources, and tried to justify it in an edit summary that this is what Fox News, India, and a minority of congress. You did not discuss the change first.  Unsurprisingly, it was immediately reverted with an explanation to discuss it first on the talk page. You did not.  However, you should have learned about Wikipedia procedure from that.


 * On January 25, 2022, you edited the Democratic Party (United States) article, saying it's political position was Authoritarian Democracy. As with your change from January 24th, you did not discuss such a controversial change.  You sourced the addition by a reference to a comedian's opinion.  Again, unsurprisingly, it was immediately reverted.  Rather than learn from that, you began an edit war, inserting it for a second time here and a third time here.  At no point did you attempt to discuss your changes.


 * Your next edits were today (February 18, 2022), where you edited the Canada article to say it was an Authoritarian Dictatorship. Again, no attempt to discuss. No sources.  It was again immediately reverted, with an edit summary to take it to the talk page.  You have not.

The above edits may demonstrate that you are not here to constructively edit and improve Wikipedia. I must warn you that the next time you behave this way on a Wikipedia article, administrative attention will be sought and you may lose your editing privileges. Singularity42 (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * To add further, the issue is not you having a specific viewpoint that the US, Canada or the Democratic Party in the US are authoritarian regimes - everyone is entitled to their viewpoint, and we don't have to all agree as Wikipedia editors. But you cannot add such POV edits in a disruptive way - i.e. you cannot do it without discussion and building a consensus first, you cannot do it by edit-warring, and you cannot do it by citing improper sources or no sources.  If you strongly feel that your views are properly sourced and need to be added constructively, you must discuss first and see if there is a consensus for the change. Singularity42 (talk) 23:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)