User talk:Igdtuw

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Amita Dev (March 5)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Dr._Amita_Dev Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Maliner was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Spam.

Maliner (talk) 05:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Amita Dev


A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Amita Dev, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Maliner (talk) 05:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Amita Dev


A tag has been placed on Dr. Amita Dev, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Grab Up -  Talk  17:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Advert and COI warnings
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, Igdtuw. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Deb,
 * I am employee of the organisation and has not been paid any thing for creating the page.
 * Further, this page has been established for the current Vice Chancellor of the State Government University of NCT of Delhi, appointed by the Honorable Chancellor and Lieutenant Governor of Delhi. It is not intended as a promotional page for any individual. Instead, it serves to provide students with information about the Vice Chancellor and her brief profile, highlighting her as an inspiring figure.
 * She serves as a role model for the students of the university, and it is important for an increasing number of students to become acquainted with their Vice Chancellor and her background. Igdtuw (talk) 17:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * We would consider you to have a conflict of interest in this case. Secretlondon (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Being an employee of the organisation means that you are getting paid. The VC may well be notable, but that is not for you to decide, nor are you allowed to write in the promotional tone you have used. Your statement that "it is important for an increasing number of students to become acquainted with their Vice Chancellor and her background" may be true, but it does not follow that Wikipedia should carry out this basic communication task on behalf of the university; that is the university's job. Dr Dev will not be included in Wikipedia unless or until someone else writes an article about her that complies with the project guidelines. Deb (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amita Dev


A tag has been placed on Amita Dev, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. jellyfish &#9993; 17:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, Igdtuw, I'd like to clarify why I nominated your page for speedy deletion as a promotional article.
 * This sentence in particular is undeniably promotional language:
 * "epitomizes true leadership, exemplary administration, and passionate research. Her extensive research focuses on Deep Neural Networks, Speech Processing, Speech Modeling, Speech Recognition, and Speech Synthesis. With over three decades of unparalleled experience in administration, teaching, innovation, and research, Dr. Dev has an exceptional track record. She has published more than 120 research papers in prestigious international and national journals and conference proceedings. As an avid speaker and motivator, she has been invited to various national and international forums."
 * You also need to cite reliable sources and provide some proof of notability, especially when it's a biography of a living person. As your article stands at the time of nomination, it's unacceptable for a Wikipedia article. I'd look at a page like Adrian Melott as a decent example of an article on an academic. I suggest, especially with your disclosed conflict of interest, that you instead create a draft article and allow it to be reviewed by the new page patrol. jellyfish &#9993; 17:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Amita Dev while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. jellyfish &#9993; 17:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your username
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, and I noticed that your username, " Igdtuw ", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Secretlondon (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)