User talk:Igini234

November 2021
Hello, I'm 10mmsocket. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Benin ivory mask have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Benin ivory mask. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. clpo13(talk) 08:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

"For persistently making disruptive edit" what is disruptive in correcting deliberate misinformation? How is correcting deliberate misinformation now translate to that am the one that is making disruptive edit, and not the people that are delibrately misinforming the public by editing the article about the mask of queen Idia of Benin, turning it to Dom Domingo of Warri inspite of numerous corrections? How am i the one making disruptive edit and not the person that edited a Benin mask originally tagged early 16th century to now early 17th century? How am i the one making disruptive edit and not the person that edited the origin of the mask claiming it Dom Domingo of Warri? Please have you cross checked what i wrote with what is in the museums most especially the British museum, and Met museum? It is Idias mask of Benin it was produced in 16th century. Olokun is Benin God of the sea not Itsekirri. I would appreciate it if you crosscheck these and give me a feed back if am wrong. Am not guilty of disruptive edit but the person that is editing and delibrately dishing out false information is the one engaging in disruptive editing, he even reported me of a crime he or she is guilty of. Am glad that corrections have been made on this article by another observant reader, hopefully it will edited and turned to the mask of Dom Domingo of Warri which insults my sensibility and the sensibility of the readers, and to me is the real disruptive editing. Thanks Igini234 (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Igni234, I've lifted the block. Your edits were misidentified as disruptive because they changed or removed information without adequately explaining why. This is why it's important to annotate your edits with appropriate edit summaries so patrolling editors and admins, who may not be familiar with the article subject, can see why the changes were made. It's clear now that you were trying to fix the article, so I apologize for the warnings and the block. clpo13(talk) 15:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)