User talk:Igiveupicantchooseadecentusernamewithoutitbeingtaken

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wicks (hairstyle) (March 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wicks (hairstyle) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wicks (hairstyle), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wicks (hairstyle) (March 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wicks (hairstyle) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wicks (hairstyle), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wicks (hairstyle) (March 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wicks (hairstyle) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wicks (hairstyle), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagleash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wicks_(hairstyle) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 06:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey
It's pretty obvious that when you submitted that article on "Slavery in New Spain", you just took the article from es.wiki and put it through Google Translate.

Don't do that. For one thing, you broke most of your templates, filenames, etc. Also, you need to mention on the talk page that it's based on es.wiki. Please fix that now. DS (talk) 17:18, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Okra, you may be blocked from editing. ''Work toward consensus rather than repeat-reverts. See WP:CON - go to the talk page to work it out.'' Zefr (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Okra edits
You are still edit warring and being disruptive to article improvements. Explain why these extensive edits were reverted without discussion or good-faith discussion with another editor trying to make the article etymology content and reference sections consistent with other articles. Zefr (talk) 02:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Every edit I have done has improved the article. I've added Information and sources supporting them about the etymology of the scientific name as well as common names. Every edit (I've seen) that you've edited has disrupted the improvements made on the article. For example on one previous edit you made you kept part of the etymology of the word gumbo on the paragraph about the etymology of the word okra. For another example more recently you reworded the last sentence about how words in other languages used to describe the plant that stem from the root of gumbo not make sense by changing the sentence's meaning completely. Igiveupicantchooseadecentusernamewithoutitbeingtaken (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Our role as editors is to write clearly and provide accurate sources formatted correctly per WP:CIT and WP:REFB. I rewrote your own content to improve clarity by separating the scientific name from the common names, and using syntax edits to clarify. I reformatted all the references for consistency with Wikipedia policy - which you did not do, then you reversed everything to your inconsistently formatted sources. My version provides clarity for users unfamiliar with this plant as a food by stating the information in plain English, whereas your version is less clear and verbose. You are a new editor with few contributions, so perhaps you do not understand that this is supposed to be a collaborative process. But you are taking the stand that only your version - including poorly formatted and irregular sources - is acceptable (to you). I took the dispute to the talk page where other editors could provide input if given enough time to evaluate and provide input, but you insist on edit-warring and maintaining your own version. WP:BRD means a constructive new version is left in place until the talk page discussion is settled for new edits per WP:CON. You are violating good-faith edits, the consensus process, and edit-warring, and you have passed WP:3RR. This can get you into trouble with administrators. Zefr (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)